RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 3 months agoNobody should own this muchsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up1194arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1191arrow-down1imageNobody should own this muchsh.itjust.worksRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square4linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLembot_0002@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareGlide@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 months agoI’d argue if they somehow remain a billionaire post mortem, then no, they’re still not a good billionaire.
minus-squareMk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoThey’re no longer billionaires at that point, their heirs are (or multi-millionaires if it’s divided enough).
minus-squareTheFogan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 months agoBecause writers/politicians/scientists are still considered such in life no matter what. On the other hand, if a billionare loses all of his money… he can in fact not be a billionare anymore.
deleted by creator
I’d argue if they somehow remain a billionaire post mortem, then no, they’re still not a good billionaire.
They’re no longer billionaires at that point, their heirs are (or multi-millionaires if it’s divided enough).
deleted by creator
Because writers/politicians/scientists are still considered such in life no matter what. On the other hand, if a billionare loses all of his money… he can in fact not be a billionare anymore.
deleted by creator