• Malgas@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The term “warlock” comes from a root (Old English, wærloga) that literally means “pact-breaker”.

    So I’d say it’s very much in the spirit of the class to eventually betray one’s patron.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, but they’re specifically talking about breaking your pact with (the Christian) god. Like, y’know, the devil did. Warlocks were devils, not protégés of devils.

      • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, within reason for the setting. There is a reason that their patron has them in the first place, and I’m betting until the warlock did the betrayal, the reason was something along the lines of “can’t act directly in the mortal realm” or somesuch. As long as this isn’t a ‘god’s wrath falls, warlock dies’ moment, there is a lot of room for fun in how a warlock might have to start dodging other warlocks or mystical beings the patron can act through.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, part the deal is likely that whatever you cut a deal with gets a new chew toy for eternity upon your death

        So you know, benefits now punishment later