I found this thought funny. A few years ago everyone was all learn to code so you don’t lose your job! Now there wont be any programming jobs in 10 years. But we will need a lot of manual labor still.

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    We are still a long ways away from AI being able to replace programmers. The amount of sheer bullshit code and wrong stuff it writes currently will cripple any information system currently keeping economies up and running.

      • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 days ago

        Until they notice that cleaning up after failed AI-written code is more expensive than writing working code from the start. Which is already happening for some companies.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Which is already happening for some companies.

          Yes. We’re just getting there. Three years ago, there wasn’t much hiring of junior developers, and it takes about three years for a junior to grow into a senior.

          It also takes 3-5 years for stupid code choices to hurt in ways that affect a businesses bottom line.

          These two factors should boil over each-other nicely in the near future.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            takes about three years for a junior to grow into a senior.

            We might have vastly different definitions what is a senior then, or you’re peaking at the Donner-Kebab curve.

            • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              We might have vastly different definitions what is a senior then

              I’m referring to the usual definition for the job title, “Senior Developer”. It’s also a pretty good bare minimum skill definition needed to not constantly make costly mistakes.

              or you’re peaking at the Donner-Kebab curve.

              I didn’t set the industry wide definition, I am using it.

              If you’re angry with the lack of titles that reflect real seniority, join a union, or start one!

              • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Why are you pushing emotions at me? Don’t do it.

                Even google’s Ai summary slop says that industry standard is 5-10 years, not 3.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I watched in real time tech bros defending AI about stealing everyone’s art to them realizing that they’re creating something that will replace them. It was sad funny.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        They will be forced to replace the laid off workers when they see that AI doesn’t replace them. Having a skill will still be valuable. Search “Klarna AI rehire”. That’s just support agents. Coders will be fine.

    • Erik@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think a lot of the crunch in the labor market for programmers is “monkey see monkey do” thinking at the big tech companies. It might even be somewhat calculated, though I hesitate to call something a conspiracy when it could simply be due to stupidity on the part of senior management.

      Large tech companies tend to have a lot of flexibility and their total headcount because they have a wide variety of departments and tasks that they can set aside for an extended period before it causes any problems. Those problems will eventually catch up with them, though, as will a code base written by somebody who doesn’t understand what they’re trying to accomplish.

      So I think the pendulum is going to swing back to a labor crunch at some point. My guess is at least another 6 months before we see any hint of that, though. I don’t think it will be as bad as it was before the advent of LLMs, though. They really are a productivity enhancing tool, particularly for software developers who know what they’re doing.

      • Harlehatschi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The only field I see LLMs enhancing productivity of competent developers is front end stuff where you really have to write a lot of bloat.

        In every other scenario software developers who know what they’re doing the simple or repetitive things are mostly solved by writing a fucking function, class or library. In today’s world developers are mostly busy designing and implementing rather complex systems or managing legacy code, where LLMs are completely useless.

        We’re developing measurement systems and data analysis tools for the automotive industry and we tried several LLMs extensively in our daily business. Not a single developer was happy with the results.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well yeah but I believe the idea is in short the uncertainty, why it’s saying “in 10 years”. Think of it now as you have a kid graduating high school this year, and asks you what to major in in college that’s likely to make enough to pay off those killer loans it’s going to take.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, Wordpress was meant to replace all professional web builders. Visual programming was meant to obsolete all programmers because everyone will be able to write software. Every decade there’s a new thing that will replace programmers. Nothing did so far.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Nothing did so far.

          You have to admit, Visual Basic 3.0 was some cool shit, though, right?

          I’ll admit it didn’t replace us, and it’s gone now. But that shit was still cool.