It’s too bad ninety million others chose not to, or we could have.
I don’t remember anyone promising anything. Just that sabotaging Harris out of spite was objectively bad and that you could bash Dems as much as you want after the election.
Nobody promised a revolution.
This also applies to Biden. So many leftists held their nose for Biden due to his progressive promises and in order to “usher in” a new generation of progressives afterwards.
Well yeah, and if more people did that we wouldn’t be dealing with nearly as many problems as we currently are.
Short term, sure.
But it would be exactly like Biden’s four years. Nothing gets fixed, lots of horrible shit still happens, and four years later we’re still choosing between a douche and a turd sandwich.
If Kamala would have won, she’d have named the DNC chair, and she’d have named another neoliberal with no interest in giving voters what they want.
It obviously would have been better if elderly neoliberals had just stepped aside for any subsequent generation, but you know that never was going to happen.
So long term, Kamala losing might be for the best because it gave us the chance to fix the party. Just like long term it probably would have been best for Biden to have lost and trump to have been prez back to back instead of kicking the can down the road which only normalized it
Nothing gets fixed,
You can’t be simultaneously mad at Trump for reversing Biden’s work and claim that Biden fixed nothing. Biden wasn’t perfect but he was doing good things.
There won’t be a long term.
Anyone claiming that Biden was senile needs to look at the current incumbent. Anyone claiming that Harris was overly emotional, needs to look at the current incumbent.
The only way out of this is to completely destroy the GOP, just like we have completely destroyed the Australian Coalition last month… Only then can things be turned around.
Anyone claiming that Biden was senile needs to look at the current incumbent
Hot take:
Two elderly racists can both be simultaneously senile.
In fact recent events would point to large amounts of people like that in America.
That doesn’t mean we got to pick one to be president
Two elderly racists can both be simultaneously senile.
The “Biden is racist” is based on Biden’s crime bill from over 30 years ago THAT WAS DEMANDED BY THE BLACK CAUCUS. It didn’t work out as well as the Black Caucus expected, but blacks as a percentage of inmates did go down.
And this somehow made Biden as racist as Trump.
“Both sides bad” is how we got Trump. Stop repeating right wing talking points.
It does actually. The system is rigged to only allow two viable candidates. Anyone who says otherwise is either a conman or just foolish. You must pick one, or the rest of the country will pick for you, and you will get nothing.
There are rare situations when a party breaks up, allowing the other party to win, but those are increasingly uncommon, because everyone knows how it will end up.
It does actually
So …
You think the only two people who could have won the election is Biden or trump?
That’s fucking crazy considering Biden dropped out due to record unpopularity…
Almost like you’re wrong…
Unfortunately too many people decided she didn’t hate Israel enough and sat out the election. And the democrats aren’t changing either way.
Which entertaining that Harris was as bad as Trump on Israel/Gaza policy (she wasn’t), every person who sat out objectively said, “I also don’t care about Russia’s genocide in Ukraine, Women’s bodily autonomy, climate change, vaccination policy, or LGBTQ+ rights.”
Suckers fell for the bullshit.
In a winner-take-all election, anything but a vote for the runner-up is an endorsement of whoever wins.
Yes, this system is stupid. But we’re not going to ever fix it by pretending that the rules of the game aren’t what they are. Any eligible voter who didn’t vote for Trump or Harris make a clear statement that Donald and protect 2025 were just fine by them. Regardless if they stayed home, voted for a vanity campaign, or just left the POTUS choice blank.
Yes. If you did not vote for Harris in an essentially two-party election, you condoned Trump and allowed him to do everything he is doing now. You can’t pretend you had no part in it, because you supported his election.
If you voted for Harris, you voted to stop Trump and Project 2025. Ie, you believed in our country, wrong or right.
Otherwise, you decided that our country was no longer worth preserving, and you handed it to people who told you they would tear it apart to “get even” with half its citizens.
And you were told that if you vote for Trump you will never have to vote again.
And what they heard was: “And you’ll never have to think again!”
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
Martin just ran out two members of the Rules and Bylaws committee…
Two neoliberal superdelegates who were literally and figuratively the problem with the party.
Ironically enough, the voting members of the DNC wouldn’t have had the chance to make this pivot to the left if more people had held their nose for Kamala.
When a Dem becomes president, they pick the DNC chair and a vote is performative. If Kamala had won, the party would have stayed in the hands of neoliberals and they’d keep running sham primaries…
Which brings me full circle to Martin running Saunders and Weingarten out of the party, they were on the committee that sets rules for primaries.
So the Dem party is being fixed, it’s just billionaires own the media and they’d rather Republicans win if a progressive makes it to the general. So there’s a push to get people disengaged from the party, if that allows a neoliberals to win the primary, the media will suddenly stop talking shit about the Dem party again.
Imagine being a Democrat…
“oops sowwy. we were only going to reform the party if we win. looks like we gotta stay late-stage capitalists and keep benefiting from fascists existing. dang”
I dont remember anyone promising to reform the party. The point was to stop infighting until after the election and agree that she was the better option.
-
Kamala was picked without the people’s input, which is bad
-
This comic trivializes Trump’s authoritarianism by equating the two, which is bad
They picked her as VP in 2020. If Biden had a heart attack on the debate stage, she’d be the incumbent.
Biden, was entrusted with the nomination. It was out of the people’s hands after that point. And ultimately the transfer was in his hands.
In addition to the fact that nobody serious ran against her, and it’s just a really unfortunate circumstance. It wasn’t authoritarianism.
I wish we had an open primary. Hell, Harris might have won if she came out of it as the DNC leader, which would probably require a harder stance on Biden.
-
