• kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    All I needed to know was when they released their BT earbuds just when the jack port got removed to figure out where their priorities are.

    • xeekei@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course they’re gonna offer BT earbuds if there’s no audio jack? Or did you want them included or something? A lot of people here are way angrier than justified.

        • xeekei@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Louis Rossman is a perfect example of someone who’s angry all the time.

            • xeekei@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I would say having a headphone jack is better than not having one, but stop short of crying conspiracy. You would feel better if they didn’t sell BT earbuds?

              • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I’m saying it is very hypocritical and goes against their brand. If they simply came out and said: Look guys making phones sustainably cost too much, we need to sell higher margin items like dongles, BT earbuds and cases to have enough cashflow to continue manufacturing and R&D.

                Ok, fair enough. I would say.

                But trying to justify and greenwashing the whole ordeal is insulting. The tactic is straight out of Apple’s “Think different” book. Paying more for reduced functionality. Only for them to sell you more accessories for even more money.