• beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      sounds weird to me. aren’t we replicating the repository problem if each distro decides to make a flatpak repo according to their own philosophies?

        • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          i don’t have an issue with multiple flatpak repos. i’d actually find it very interesting if we went a more decentralized route with flatpak (maybe kde, gnome, mozzila would each have their own repos). but i don’t see the point of a distro-specific flatpak when we already have normal packages. compatibility is kind of a non-issue, since you’re not supposed to install them elsewhere anyway (unlike flatpaks)

          also, i see absolutely no reason to use fedora’s flatpak repo on debian given that flathub exists already. you could add it if you want it, but what’s the point?

      • quarterlife@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, we are. It’s exactly why it shouldn’t be done and why Fedora is the only project wasting their time with this.