His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sure it does. Notice i said unreasonable harm. There is a clear distinction between refusing to take someone’s wedding photo and providing someone with life saving care.

      There are US Court cases that deal with this distinction.

      Edit: i originally said unnecessarily as opposed to unreasonably… But the point still stands