I’m pretty sure loads of other classes have alignment restrictions - notably clerics and paladins
Early d&d had the universe constructed as interlocking planes of law, chaos, good, and evil, with the world on the intersection of all those. That was the reason for heroes and monsters - they were touched by our created from one of the planes.
The world was a battleground between the planes, and alignment was your alignment to the planes, which side of each fight you were on. It has gotten weaker each version since
In 3.5 I usually play druids and usually neutral-good as I still have that old model in my head and if I’m not going to care about one axis, it’s going to be law/chaos
I’m pretty sure loads of other classes have alignment restrictions - notably clerics and paladins
I remember my D&D 3.x DM insisting we follow RAW, so if I wanted to take levels in assassin (who else remembers prestige classes?) then I had to be evil. 3 players went along, and the druid betrayed us to the “good” guys. Had a massive brawl where we (team evil) won, thanks in part to a hail mary “I run around the corner and hide. That’s… a natural 20 for 37” the betraying druid player couldn’t beat.
Cleric alignment requesites go largely unnoticed by the player. staying within one step of diety is pretty easy, probably comes automatically to most people who would be interested in the class on the first place. Alignment gets complicated for them in considering if it’s appropriate to cast magic circle or not or holy word or not. but usually it’s safe to assume for those.
Paladin is responsible for I think almost all alignment hangups at the table. sure, there are others but not as often.
Druid probably would be because communicating the concept of neutrality is full of hangups but I think druids are pretty underplayed.
Indeed, the class has a few fans like me. I don’t get why they’re so unpopular, druids are powerful and probably more broken breakable than any of the basic classes (at least in 3.5)
![This is what alignment does to your brain [Dungeons & Dragons/Pathfinder]](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/cea7f325-b1b7-448a-9d85-8c90b51622c4.webp){kind=link}
I’m pretty sure loads of other classes have alignment restrictions - notably clerics and paladins
Early d&d had the universe constructed as interlocking planes of law, chaos, good, and evil, with the world on the intersection of all those. That was the reason for heroes and monsters - they were touched by our created from one of the planes.
The world was a battleground between the planes, and alignment was your alignment to the planes, which side of each fight you were on. It has gotten weaker each version since
In 3.5 I usually play druids and usually neutral-good as I still have that old model in my head and if I’m not going to care about one axis, it’s going to be law/chaos
I remember my D&D 3.x DM insisting we follow RAW, so if I wanted to take levels in assassin (who else remembers prestige classes?) then I had to be evil. 3 players went along, and the druid betrayed us to the “good” guys. Had a massive brawl where we (team evil) won, thanks in part to a hail mary “I run around the corner and hide. That’s… a natural 20 for 37” the betraying druid player couldn’t beat.
Cleric alignment requesites go largely unnoticed by the player. staying within one step of diety is pretty easy, probably comes automatically to most people who would be interested in the class on the first place. Alignment gets complicated for them in considering if it’s appropriate to cast magic circle or not or holy word or not. but usually it’s safe to assume for those.
Paladin is responsible for I think almost all alignment hangups at the table. sure, there are others but not as often.
Druid probably would be because communicating the concept of neutrality is full of hangups but I think druids are pretty underplayed.
Indeed, the class has a few fans like me. I don’t get why they’re so unpopular, druids are powerful and probably more
brokenbreakable than any of the basic classes (at least in 3.5)