why?

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What would the “front door” even be in this case? What comes to my mind is the corresponding app on your phone, but that doesn’t really make sense in this context.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In this case, the “front door” would just be not hiding it. Normal, un-hidden APIs. A back door is usually something that the developer includes without informing the user, but they don’t need to be surreptitious; there’s no legal reason to pretend that they’re not collecting the data, and unless you’ve built your brand on privacy and security, there’s no business reason to do so either in the current cultural climate.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And given that the appliance needs to communicate with the app on your phone while you’re not home in the first place, there probably isn’t even a separate tracking API vs. data just being harvested as part of normal operations. So “back door” doesn’t really fit. “Broken by design” or “spyware” would be more apt, I think.

        Still, I’m really not a fan of calling any spying/data harvesting a “front door” – IIRC, the term was coined by an FBI head pushing for back doors in our phones so the FBI could scan our messages. But he called it a “front door” as a way to dodge the reasons why building back doors in our security software is a terrible idea.

        It’s just another step in the terrible trend of “let’s pretend that this horrible idea is ok if we just rename it” :(