• psudojo@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    im all for the something you have + something you are , pb&j relationship, but i dont think lathering biometrics on top is a good idea,far too many spy movies have shown Tom Cruise doing the MOST for pictures of eyeballs and fingerprints for me to ever trust this type of auth

    • Herowyn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main issue with biometrics is that you can’t change them. If your fingerprints or retina are compromised you’re fucked.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet, as a service member that was part of the 2013 OPM data breech, my finger prints (and an estimated 5.5 million other peoples) were part of the dataset that was stolen.

          So… What’s your point about “Global Internet”? If my data was stolen, and sent to the “Global Internet”(The fuck does this even mean?)… There’s no functional difference to an exposed password.

          • MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            My point is that I’m not worried about the relatively few people who could steal my fingerprint. I’m worried about the millions of people around the world who will try to steal my passwords and access my online accounts.

            If everyone secured their accounts with a biometrically secured security key, they would be far more secure than if they continue to just use a password.

            Tgose who go around spreading misinformed FUD over biometrics ensure people who don’t know better continue to use weak passwords.

            Even if someone gets your fingerprints from the OPM breach still can’t use them because they also need your phone. You are still protected from all of the hackers around the world.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              My point is that I’m not worried about the relatively few people who could steal my fingerprint.

              This group is much larger than you’re assuming.

              I’m worried about the millions of people around the world who will try to steal my passwords and access my online accounts.

              Bio doesn’t stop people from setting bad passwords.

              If everyone secured their accounts with a biometrically secured security key, they would be far more secure than if they continue to just use a password.

              Except you should know better than this… They will simply do BOTH. Set a terrible password because they will be required to make one from the get-go AND use bio. There is no service on the face of the planet that strictly accepts tokens from Bio tools. Simply using Bio doesn’t stop those online from bruteforcing the underlying password.

              Tgose who go around spreading misinformed FUD over biometrics ensure people who don’t know better continue to use weak passwords.

              No. I “Spread FUD” because I understand that a good password MUST be revocable. Which Bio CANNOT be. Bio is a username.

              Even if someone gets your fingerprints from the OPM breach still can’t use them because they also need your phone. You are still protected from all of the hackers around the world.

              No… I’m protected because I use functionally impossible passwords to break that are truly randomly generated and of sufficient length. Further to protect things I use a Yubikey, when supported. Further I use services that monitor breeches and actively change those affected passwords. Bio adds nothing to my protection and in my case (and the case of millions of other people) would actively hinder it.

              You have the premise backwards though. It’s now, if someone has your device at all… you cannot presume it to be capable of securing anything since your prints are likely on the device itself anyway, oops…

              • MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                There is no service on the face of the planet that strictly accepts tokens from Bio tools. Simply using Bio doesn’t stop those online from bruteforcing the underlying password.

                https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/account-billing/how-to-go-passwordless-with-your-microsoft-account-674ce301-3574-4387-a93d-916751764c43

                https://blog.google/technology/safety-security/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-password/

                https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/12/apple-passkey/

                No. I “Spread FUD” because I understand that a good password MUST be revocable. Which Bio CANNOT be. Bio is a username.

                Incorrect because your bio is not the password, the private key is. The private key is revocable. Your bio just unlocks your hardware key store and makes the private key accessible to the software.

                This is what I mean when I say people do not understand biometric authentication.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/account-billing/how-to-go-passwordless-with-your-microsoft-account-674ce301-3574-4387-a93d-916751764c43

                  Uh huh…

                  Once you remove your password from your account, you will need to sign in using a passwordless method like the Microsoft Authenticator app, Windows Hello, physical security keys, or SMS codes.

                  SMS

                  So which 2fa method do we NEVER ask users to use anymore? You know… because lying to a phone carrier and getting a new sim card sent to someone who isn’t on the account is the hardest thing in the world to do! Or cloning a sim card.

                  Windows Hello

                  Which just had some leaks about how insecure it is.

                  You’re going to have to do way better than this…

                  Regardless all three of these would then rely on your specific device to login, which MUST have a recovery method. Since you know… devices break, get reformatted, etc… What does that process look like? With a password… I simply change the password. Can you guarantee that I can revoke the key and replace it without having to buy new hardware?


                  https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/12/apple-passkey/

                  They sync shit using iCloud… The private key is not secure. I don’t care what your argument is if it’s in relation to apple. If you need further argument on this topic… Just look at all the leaked videos from Tesla cars. Big companies DO NOT DESERVE YOUR TRUST.


                  Incorrect because your bio is not the password, the private key is. The private key is revocable. Your bio just unlocks your hardware key store and makes the private key accessible to the software.

                  And you say I don’t have an understanding… It doesn’t matter how many keys deep you have to go. If the end of the line is an item that has been compromised, it DOESN’T MATTER how many steps you take after that. The compromised item is already obtained when you obtained the device.

                  Now… Can you tell me the process to revoke the private key from your fingerprint reader on your phone? You claim it’s revocable. Revoke it. Show me. I’ll wait. Can you prove that the blob in your phone is doing that? These chips are written once at the manufacturer with no oversight or validation. I’m not an idiot. I know your literal fingerprint isn’t sent up to the cloud. It’s used to tell a local chip to authenticate a public key against the private one contained within that typically never leaves the chip (except that the passkey standard actually allows key mobility, so it’s actually worse than the FIDO standard that it’s built upon). It’s a blob that you have no insight into and no control over.

                  If I were to bump into you, and lift your phone. I’d likely have your fingerprint just by lifting it off your phone and can sign into your phone. That’s it… It’s like you didn’t have a password at all because I simply HAVE it. I’ve found that theft is actually much greater risk in my life than my digital footprint. But that’s only because I can actually mitigate the digital stuff by not being retarded and putting everything into the internet. Theft on the other hand… Can’t do much about someone who willingly knocks me the fuck out (gasp! the XKCD comic strikes again!). But I can make sure that if they knock me the fuck out, they don’t just get to take my shit and unlock it without my brain remaining functional.

                  None of that even matters. This is a chain of trust that I can’t actually audit… So it’s worthless. This requires that I trust Google (android), Samsung(or other device manufacturer), their vendors(whoever makes the fingerprint reader), etc… You know who I have to to trust for my password? My password manager and myself. The fun part is that my password manager is actually audited… and opensource, AND I’ve looked at it enough to be happy with it. Who audited Windows Hello? https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/22/23972220/microsoft-windows-hello-fingerprint-authentication-bypass-security-vulnerability Ooops.

                  It’s funny, because you know what this does to authentication? It puts all the power into another companies hands… and takes ALL of it out of yours. Which is interesting that someone on Lemmy is gung-ho about this.

                  Let’s look at a real world example of something you might ACTUALLY have to do. You’re crossing the border into a country. You have data you really don’t want the government snooping into like hot nudes from your significant other. So you wipe your device before you cross the border to ensure the government can’t violate your rights. Oops, you no longer can access ANY account you own because you relied on that device to be what unlocks everything.

                  Also, whats more likely… that you break a device or that a user CANNOT learn how to use a password manager?

                  Edit: For shits and giggles I logged into my Google account to see what the passkey setup even looks like for them… Turns out that it’s automatically created keys for devices I’ve logged into… Including devices I don’t own anymore.

                  Really secure that is! Nothing screams security like creating methods to access my account without my fucking knowledge. What a joke.

                  • MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Which just had some leaks about how insecure it is.

                    Windows Hello didn’t. The hardware wasn’t implemented correctly allowing the authentication to be bypassed. You misunderstood the issue here

                    They sync shit using iCloud…

                    They sync the public key with iCloud, not the private key. You misunderstood how it works.

                    It doesn’t matter how many keys deep you have to go.

                    There is no “keys deep” there is a public/private key pair that authenticates a single device with a single account. You have misunderstood how a local key store works.

                    The compromised item is already obtained when you obtained the device.

                    Which means someone trying to access my account requires physical access to my device. Passwords, no matter how strong leave you open to remote attack.

                    Can you tell me the process to revoke the private key from your fingerprint reader on your phone?

                    Open the authencator app and remove the account. Or uninstall the authenticator app. Or delete your local phone account. Or factory reset if you want to go nuclear.

                    Alternatively if you lost your phone, go to the account online. Browse to the security section and delete the device from the list. Most services have the ability to sign out remotely. All that’s doing is revoking the key. The phone doesn’t have to do anything. The fact you think something needs change in the “blob” shows you do not understand how encryption works.

                    If I were to bump into you, and lift your phone.

                    Again physical access, not remote access. Much smaller attack vector than a password.

                    It puts all the power into another companies hands… and takes ALL of it out of yours.

                    You think passwords take power from the company that stores your passwords remotely? You have no idea how they are storing that password. You don’t have to trust the company, you just have to trust the open standard these companies are implementing and that public/private key encryption is the standard used to secure the entire Internet.

                    Also, whats more likely… that you break a device or that a user CANNOT learn how to use a password manager?

                    Virtually no one uses a password manager. It’s too much hassle.

        • Herowyn@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t need to be physical breach. If it’s stored somewhere it can (and might) be accessed by someone else and reconstructed.