• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.

    • mcmoor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?