Given what we know about the limits of soil seqeustration this is basically a PR exercise by the meat industry to keep the methane flowing into the atmosphere.

  • LeadEyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Raising animals for meat isn’t inherently an awful thing for the environment. There is land that is useful for grazing but unsuitable for growing crops. Turning inedible grasses into meat is very useful but industrial scale grain fed and fattened meat production clearly is a problem.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a huge part of it. The second problem is that cattle produce a lot of methane as part of their digestive process. Other species produce a lot less.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We would need alot less land, if we only used it for plants to feed humans, instead of using it to produce meat. Land that is now used for grazing could be rewildered and contribute to countering the massive loss in biodiversity. It is one of the greatest errors of the system we live in, that everything is seen trough the lens of generating short term profits.