Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    The technology will never be ready if you don’t test it.

    And I would argue we DON’T need warning lights since, while imperfect, most self-driving tech is already vastly better than your average driver. We should have warning lights for cars that DON’T have self-driving.

    This is ultimately why we will NEVER have self-driving cars en masse, because society isn’t willing to take the necessary risks to improve the safety of everyone on the road.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure. But we’re jumping into the deep end by legally allowing the driver to be exempt from distracted driving laws. There’s a big difference between testing the technology and relying on the technology.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        legally allowing the driver to be exempt from distracted driving laws.

        Can you cite the legislation that exempts drivers using driver assistance systems from paying attention while driving?

        There’s a big difference between testing the technology and relying on the technology.

        No one should be relying on the technology.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          California, Nevada, and Germany all have laws for it. The article this comment section is based on specifically mentions California and Nevada.