• nakal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is a lot of power to waste for the savings you made, when not buying expensive SSDs (20€ a year is not much). Where we use HDDs, we don’t care about noise. Durability? We use huge RAID systems with lots of redundancy.

    I personally like to swap new drives after 5 years to avoid failures. So when you find a 16 TB SSD for 350€, you send me a message.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      My 4 bay HDD NAS uses around 45W, 50W with some light load, 70W spinning up. That’s about 1kWh per day, or 150 EUR per year.

      I use it in my room, so I very much care about noise.

      More durability = less redundancy (less cost) + less frequent swaps (less cost). My anecdotal evidence is 1 failed SSD in 15 years (160GB Intel, basically first Gen). Every other SSD is still working. I have a drawer full of failed HDDs.

      Plus more performance.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Geez power is expensive for you folks.

        In Vancouver we pay 0.14 CAD per kWh (.096 EUR) for usage beyond 675kWh in a month. (0.0975CAD, 0.068 EUR, before the threshold)

    • guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      With the SSD’s I can afford, there are what you might call “net negative savings” when I save maybe a couple dollars in power a month but have to replace them every few months. We can’t all afford EVO’s.