• wahming@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The number of people is irrelevant in the context, only the birth vs death rate. For context, there were about 10.5 million deaths in China last year. For social stability, you’d want the population to at most have a slight decline. A 50% higher death rate than birth rate is NOT slight.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, adding over 7 million people is what’s important, and it’s a huge number.

      We’re talking about a loss of 3 million once you factor in deaths. If it was a country like Canada, with a population of less than 50 million people, that would be problematic.

      But with a population pool of 1.5 billion, what’s the actual concern? What social instability does this cause that a population of 1.5 billion already doesn’t?

      There will never be too few people in China, and a slow population decline from 1.5 billion allows for a more sustainable future.