• astroPug@hachyderm.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    @7of9 @USSBurritoTruck

    I’ll raise my hand and say that I actually enjoyed all three seasons. I felt like 1 and 2 had a sense of melancholy at times, but that was welcome. Kind of felt right at that time in my life.
    3 I really liked for the interpersonal relationships, and that sense of wonder in space.

    • Seven@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, 1 and 2 both dealt with deep themes of grief and generational trauma … I appreciated that they tried to write a story with a deep meaning to it, even if it didn’t 100% work it was better than a lot of the recent things I’ve watched

      • astroPug@hachyderm.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        @7of9

        Yes, I found it resonated with me.

        I was a kid when I first watched TNG reruns, and things seemed safe and optimistic to me. It was also the nature of television to almost reset characters from episode to episode, no matter how difficult or traumatic the previous episode was. (An exception would be the episode where Picard mends fences with his brother and begins facing the trauma of having been assimilated.)

        And I think that was good tv in its own right.

        1/2

        • astroPug@hachyderm.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          @7of9

          But Season 1 Picard took a different approach, and showed Picard dealing with past disillusionment (the loss of his career which was his purpose, et .) in a more long term manner. It wasn’t just gone. And to me, it made sense in the context of my own life. As I aged, I didn’t recover from past hurts quite as quickly either. But we work through it and grow, at any age, and I think that’s what Picard as a character did as well.

          2/more

          • astroPug@hachyderm.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            @7of9

            He’s a different person at that age, definitely more careful, and he’s aware that he doesn’t have all his former health, abilities or status - and that’s ok! He saves people, reconnects (and makes up) with old friends, and has a long-term relationship (maybe?). He’s doing pretty well!

            Plus, he reminded Starfleet and the Federation a little of ideals.

            All that, I found very hopeful and more effective as if neither Starfleet nor Picard had ever met failure.

            Lol, sorry that was long!

            • Seven@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Don’t be sorry for your reply being long, it was clearly well thought out and considered. I agree on all the points you’ve made … perhaps the majority of people here didn’t like Picard 1 & 2 because it wasn’t repeating the type of story telling that Star Trek has typically given, but was a whole new thing. People, generally, don’t like change and I think in the current world there’s comfort to be had in the “monster of the week” style 90s shows.

              • astroPug@hachyderm.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                @7of9

                Thank you.

                Yes, I think so, too. Familiarity is comforting, and I also feel that episodic storytelling is comforting, because it’s reminiscent of my childhood, and because it introduces new, interesting concepts but sticks with a familiar structure. I just get value out of the other type of stories as well.

                I am curious what they’ll do for a Picard movie - or a show of Seven and crew.