For decades, the most prominent American unions were largely supportive of Israel. Today, though, amid a resurgence of the American labor movement, some activists are urging their unions to call for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza and succeeding — a change that reflects a broader generational shift.

But many unions are divided over what stance to take or whether to take any stance at all.

Some American labor leaders have remained supportive of Israel’s war against Hamas, and moved swiftly to condemn Hamas’s attacks on Oct. 7. They are dismayed by the views of a younger generation of organizers who in some cases oppose Israel’s existence as a Jewish state.

“There has been a shift in society, and that’s reflected in the labor movement as it is every place else,” said Stuart Appelbaum, president of the Jewish Labor Committee and head of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union.

Archive

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I never said I approved of that either. I’m just voicing my opinion on what the role of unions is / should be.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      That wasn’t my question.

      Your theory, that unions should avoid picking a side, does not have any basis in how actual unions act in the real world.

      Why do you think that is?

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          🙄

          They had so much to say about why unions should remain neutral, but I keep coming back to the fact that the unions have never been neutral. So either the poster believes they have cracked the code and all other union leaders are too stupid to grasp it, or something else is going on.

          • Speex@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you don’t really have a point and are simply looking to argue.

            It was very clearly stated in the comment what the intent of the comment was.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The intent of their comment was “voicing my opinion on what the role of unions is / should be.”

              I asked why unions, in the real world, do not behave that way. Why are actually existing unions acting in roles that they do not believe unions should? If that’s what the role of unions is or should be, then in the real world unions would try to fulfill that role. They do not.

              There’s a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of unions that I’m trying to highlight by showing how wrong it is!