Is it a good (probably temporary) way to get content in Lemmy?

  • Hedup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Reddit was all about reposting content. Whether it was from news sites or twitter, it was full of it. There’s no reason why that couldn’t be done here. Especially in early days.

  • llama@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly yes I think it makes sense to do this, as long as the content itself isn’t hosted on reddit. It would be cool if somebody could make a bot for mods to enable this in their communities to specify subs to pull posts from and how often.

  • dystop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I created !maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world a few days ago. Now it has >4k subscribers. I credit that to my meticulous reposting of content from other places (90% from /r/maliciousompliance, 10% from elsewhere). It took a bit of effort but now people are posting their OC.

    A site like this needs to reach critical mass to be self-sustaining. I see a lot of new communities with 0-1 posts from the mod. That’s not nearly enough to get people engaged - users are going to see that it’s a ghost town and leave. Reposts are a temporary measure to get past the chicken-and-egg problem of “there’s nothing here so people aren’t visiting” and “people aren’t visiting so they aren’t posting stuff”.

    Reddit itself exists on reposts. As a (ex-)Redditor of 12 years, I’ve seen countless reposts. Ideally, reposts make up a small percentage of the content, but given the small nature of this universe, I’d personally encourage and advocate reposting of content from elsewhere to kickstart discussion.

  • sneakyninjapants@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m of two minds about it. On one hand it would give Lemmy users more content to interact with which is good, on the other you’re directing to where we just came from and increasing engagement there which is bad. So I’m on the fence. If someone wants to do it it’s worth the experiment IMO, but I’m largely not going to be clicking that Reddit link unless its compelling. If it’s linked to an external site aside from reddit I’m all for it though, so long as it doesn’t get out of hand.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that the situation being described isn’t linking to Reddit, but linking to what Reddit is linking to.

      • sneakyninjapants@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that will end up being the case I’m all for it. Just so long as it’s not a 1:1 copy with discussion posts and all. At least until lemmy gets bigger