NASA’s incredible new solid-state battery pushes the boundaries of energy storage: ‘This could revolutionize air travel’::“We’re starting to approach this new frontier of battery research."

    • Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah! Thank goodness for that magical gas appearance! And there’s never any rare earth metals used in those pesky computers on cars these days! Nobody has touch screens or anything! It’s all switches and dials like we used to have in the 70s!

      Right? ….right?

    • Cam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disagree all you want. I made my case and it is well proven in the world.

      • TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m certainly always open to the possibility that my views are incorrect, but I tend to base them on facts proven by repeatable science, which is why I linked studies and am requesting you do the same to back up your “well-proven case.”

        You haven’t made any cases because you haven’t provided any studies. If it’s well-proven, linking us some studies should be easy.

        I’d also encourage you to read the studies I linked because you might change your view on this subject. If you’re interested in learning, anyway.

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Alright. Do note that there is lots of censorship around this topic. Many scientists have had their careers ruined or been censored when publishing work that goes against the climate narritive. Not many know this.

          A few times in the past I have shared internet sources but was accussed of sharing unoffical sources, or unreliable sources, etc. Kinda like being accusee of sharing fake news since it did not come from a pro green NGO or government.

          I do believe the points I made earlier came from either Patrick Moore or Alex Epstein.

          • Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Called it way above in the comments didn’t I? I must have ESPN or something.

            So just so we’re clear; if there’s published scientific data around it: it’s a conspiracy of scientific censorship because of the “climate narrative”, but if it’s unproven opinion narrative that works for the oil companies profits that happen to be huge public policy lobbying forces; it’s definitely the truth. Because obscure scary reasons, “not many people know this” Got it.

            • TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is the least satisfying “conversation” I think I’ve ever had on Lemmy. Usually, I’ve found SOME common ground or an ability to prove a point but this has been supremely frustrating and honestly frightening.

              No wonder humanity is having trouble with climate change; this is what we’re up against: A complete disability to think critically.

            • Cam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Called it way above in the comments didn’t I? I must have ESPN or something.

              So just so we’re clear; if there’s published scientific data around it: it’s a conspiracy of scientific censorship because of the “climate narrative”, but if it’s unproven opinion narrative that works for the oil companies profits that happen to be huge public policy lobbying forces; it’s definitely the truth. Because obscure scary reasons, “not many people know this” Got it.

              Sigh. Now I remember why I do not take part in these discussions back on Reddit. Lots of inmature tribalism. Believe in whatever you want since whatever I present is never going to be considered valid.

              • Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Feelings mutual. You’re choosing to ignore all the data people are presenting you with cited information and then calling it invalid or a conspiracy of censorship. If you wanted to see people’s opinions sway, show the data. Nobody here is commenting about the morality of the issue or in a way that couldn’t be swayed.

          • TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh good, more unverifiable claims. As much time as you’ve spent commenting on this post, surely you could’ve come up with some links containing some actual evidence to back up your claims?

            Do people not know about this stuff you claim because it’s made up? I’m very open minded and curious about your viewpoint, but you’ve given me absolutely nothing to go off of here.

            You can’t just make claims and say shit like this without backing it up somehow.

            You’ve provided the names of two people; am I supposed to go read ALL of their work??

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. They likely had their careers ruined because they did shoddy work.

            The points you made earlier are simply incorrect with even the most conservative estimates. So you should clearly not be listening to whoever wrote them.