• Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is this still a thing… this should be the top issue on all political agendas

      • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now I don’t agree with it (in fact, I am strongly opposed to the tax exemption), but the reasoning is that this way you create an ‘even playing field’ for aviators all across the globe. In other words: it’s doesn’t become more attractive to tank in Arab Gulf states, making their airlines out-compete European airlines.

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve heard this reason being mentioned, but I’m not really convinced by it. If this is of concern, you can tax the combustion of fuel on flights going in or out of the country, instead of taxing the sale of the fuel.

        • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not like the plane has much of an option where to tank. Planes don’t tank more than needed for any flight. I struggle to comprehend this point

        • Don_alForno@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Introduce tariffs on kerosene remaining in landing planes and used during the flight. Problem solved.

        • Kelteseth@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But this could be said about every industry, right? Oh, if we would be not be taxed, we would be more competitive worldwide.

          • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Indeed, but aviation is slightly more mobile than say steel production. It’s a bad excuse nonetheless, if you ask me!

            • Don_alForno@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s really not. It’s the most immobile industry there is. They literally have to land in the places where people want to go to, they can’t just produce their “goods” anywhere and ship them.

    • ApfelstrudelWAKASAGI@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I knew about the lack of a kerosene tax for flights but no VAT on international flights is just downright nuts to me.

      Bread, Tampons, and books are more highly taxed than (most international) flights. Talk about distorted markets.

  • FlapKap@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article presents some good suggestions. It’s pretty bonkers that taking the train across borders in Europe is more difficult and expensive than a plane