• 700 Posts
  • 186 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2024

help-circle
























  • Das passt zum Thema (leider)

    Erster Prozess gegen Ex-BVT-Chefinspektor Egisto Ott am 6. November – (Archiv)

    Am 6. November steht der frühere leitende Mitarbeiter des aufgelösten [Österreichischen] Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz und Terrorismusbekämpfung (BVT), Egisto Ott, wegen Amtsmissbrauch vor Gericht.

    […] Ott wird in der anstehenden Hauptverhandlung zur Last gelegt, er habe in seiner damaligen Stellung als Beamter des Innenministeriums im Auftrag des mitangeklagten früheren FPÖ-Politikers Hans-Jörg Jenewein einen weiteren Beamten beauftragt, Informationen zu Teilnehmern eines Treffens europäischer Nachrichten- und Geheimdienste zu beschaffen.

    […] Gegen Ott wird von der Staatsanwaltschaft Wien seit 2017 wegen Amtsmissbrauchs, geheimen Nachrichtendiensts zum Nachteil Österreichs und weiterer Delikte ermittelt. Am 29. März 2024 wurde er fest- und bis zum 26. Juni in U-Haft genommen. Ausschlaggebend für die Inhaftierung waren Informationen, Ott habe Diensthandys von drei früheren Kabinettsmitarbeitern des seinerzeitigen Innenministers Wolfgang Sobotka (ÖVP) dem russischen Inlandsgeheimdienst FSB übergeben.

    […] Ott bestreitet [auch] einen SINA-Laptop mit möglicherweise brisantem Datenmaterial dem FSB verkauft zu haben. Das Gerät soll am 19. November 2022 in Wien mit falschen Pässen ausgestatteten Männern, die vermutlich dem russischen Geheimdienst zuzurechnen waren, übergeben und über Istanbul nach Moskau zum Sitz des FSB gebracht worden sein. Den Deal eingefädelt haben soll Ex-Wirecard-Vorstand Jan Marsalek, der mittlerweile für den russischen Geheimdienst tätig sein soll.



  • Burying Radioactive Nuclear Waste Poses Enormous Risks – (Archived link)

    Although it may not produce the emissions that burning fossil fuels does, nuclear power presents many other problems. Mining, processing and transporting uranium to fuel reactors creates toxic pollution and destroys ecosystems, and reactors increase risks of nuclear weapons proliferation and radioactive contamination. Disposing of the highly radioactive waste is also challenging. […]

    Even without an accident, trucking the wastes will emit low levels of radiation, which industry claims will produce “acceptable” exposure. Transferring it from the facility to truck and then to repository also poses major risks. […]

    The spent fuel will remain radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years, and contamination and leaks are possible during storage, containment, transportation and burial. Industry, with its usual “out of sight, out of mind” approach, has no valid way to monitor the radioactive materials once they’re buried. […]

    Nuclear power is enormously expensive and projects always exceed budgets. It also takes a long time to build and put a reactor into operation. Disposing of the radioactive wastes creates numerous risks. Energy from wind, solar and geothermal with energy storage costs far less, with prices dropping every day, and comes with far fewer risks.

    Addition: I posted that recently in a similar context:

    IAEA-database of nuclear and radiological incidents

    Note that although the list which is linked above gives an impression of the spread, diversity and frequency of incidents and accidents with nuclear power plants and radioactive transports, it is not a complete list of all nuclear incidents and accidents; different national regulators have different regimes as to which incidents to report to the IAEA and which not.




  • Additional interesting stats, especially regarding statement on the safety of nuclear energy and waste:

    IAEA-database of nuclear and radiological incidents

    Note that although the list which is linked above gives an impression of the spread, diversity and frequency of incidents and accidents with nuclear power plants radioactive transports, it is not a complete list of all nuclear incidents and accidents; different national regulators have different regimes as to which incidents to report to the IAEA and which not.

    One article on nuclear energy in the UK from May 2024 says:

    A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK’s nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money…The waste itself includes 110,000 tonnes of uranium, 6,000 tonnes of spent nuclear fuels & about 120 tonnes of plutonium. – Source

    [Edit typo.]









  • 0x815@feddit.orgtoEurope@feddit.org*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    A detail that is buried somewhere in this article is that Fico’s government apparently takes de facto control of Slovak parliament’s intelligence oversight committee, which is traditionally controlled by the opposition. So there is no independent oversight at all.

    It’s time for the EU and its member states to ban any surveillance software and protect EE2E (including abandoning such things like ‘chat control’) if they want protect Europe from the further rise of authoritarian regimes.