Says who? Regardless, at least someone trying to reduce one’s dependancy on this shit is doing something rather than simply disregarding any attempts like you are.

Right, if we can reduce it but not stop it we might as well not even try!

“Oh we no longer have slaves, we call them prisoners now and everyone is just okay with it.”

The only ones alienated are the dumbfuck deniers. If you disagree with that, I said what I said.

When the internet is eventually oversaturated with smartbots, where will the humans go.

Ehhh… no, not really https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x

How about we tear down your home and neighborbood and build a windfarm over it? You will also not be compensated in any way or enough. I accept no arguments here, this is literally what you’re saying is okay to do to someone else.

Yeah, we need to know that when you finally add HCIM mode and someone reaches 200m with all skills -4,600,000,000 steps- it was entirely legit.

That’s exactly how I feel about centrists. Curious.

Somewhere in the middle means there’s a middle and side-leaning, yes.

Middle implies middle. If you are leaning towards a side, then you’re side-leaning. You can’t have your cake and eat it too, centrist, that’s what everyone makes fun of ya’ll for.

Sounds like you should unionize if you feel exploited.

Fun fact, the only people who get to decide if they’re being exploited are the basketball players. They seem to want to unionize so, yeah, seems like they agree with me. It’s exploitation.

Boohoo kids aren’t being exploited for your entertainment, what a terrible world!

Jumping between Warframe and BG3, two games that are more than capable of keeping me busy with something Def excited for Whispers in the Walls

Literally all of the posts on Steam discussion boards that say “dead game” are farming those clown trophies to gain points in Steam.

Just go through any game news and you’ll see them everywhere

Sir, this is a Wendy’s.

(I have no clue what you’re on about, and frankly, I’m not known to be omniscient)

The real solution is to make sure everyone involved with the wedding is armed. Including the ring bearers, whether they be child, dog, goat, etc.

Similar question to what I posed the other person; do you really think you’ve serviced an equal number of low income and high income customers to back up your conclusions?

A bit difficult to make that claim when I imagine you didn’t know each customers background, noted it down, and accounted for how proportinal your compared groups were.

You’ve dealt primarily with low/middle income customers and you don’t think that sways your “findings?”