My guess is most airlines have clauses in their terms and conditions that allow them to change the aircraft type without prior notice. Pretty sure their lawyers would argue that this is considered a management right for operational reasons.

But I’m no expert 🙃

I know perplexity.ai, but don’t think it’s “open source privacy respecting”

I can’t stop watching this 🤣

And for the creation of this thought water was also involved; assuming this was indeed a showerthougt

Big beards can alter facial recognition and obscure expressions, making someone look more unpredictable or wild to observers.

This comment was so wholesome it made my day 🥰

An academic book about emojis that can’t include emojis? That’s ironic and frustrating. Makes me sad that we live in a world where copyright hinders education and discussion 🙈

Here is a Tl;Dr for the ones who don’t want to click the link:

Oxford professor Jieun Kiaer published an academic book called “Emoji Speak: Communications and Behaviours on Social Media,” exploring how emojis are used across different cultures and ages, and considering their future in digital communication.

Although the book discusses emojis in detail, Kiaer was unable to include actual images of many emojis due to copyright concerns, despite the fact that these symbols are ubiquitous in social media spaces, which are almost entirely copyright-free.

Instead of using actual emojis, Kiaer hired an artist, Loli Kim, to draw similar representations, illustrating the barriers that exist between the online and offline worlds concerning copyright.

The inability to use emojis in the book, even in an academic context, highlights the complications and absurdity of modern copyright laws, which some argue could have constituted a fair use situation.

I think it’s Whitchurch, but I didn’t take the picture so I’m not 100% sure

Please tell me it’s publishing the first version 😘