You’ve got a point. This can be a sign of something sinister. It’s not necessarily a bad a sign but the situation that the previous user pointed out happens frequently enough that it could be.
Not in a union yet? Not a problem. Become a Wobbly and join the only anticapitalist union out there.
You’ve got a point. This can be a sign of something sinister. It’s not necessarily a bad a sign but the situation that the previous user pointed out happens frequently enough that it could be.
I really don’t get why someone would do this other than to play out some sort of sick fantasy. No one good ever destroys public utilities.
I’m aware that’s how they work but when the system “works” and the result is starving families then maybe it’s time we rethink whether we should keep following this system, no?
I love that we need ironclad proof to decide whether or not it’s okay for people to be able to afford sustenance or not. If there’s no proof then, oh well! The poors will just have to make do.
I choose to believe the person that gave you 1 will bump into you again and say “now we’re talking” before disappearing into a crowd.
It’s really hard to take the “law” seriously when we constantly see rich people getting away with violating it.
Wouldn’t it have been hilarious if that’s what happened after the fact?
Shouldn’t it be over estimates?
This is villainous.
That sounds like a setup to a deez nuts joke.
Counterpoint: he’s dead.
Humanity has been putting sausages between buns since the beginning of time.
It’s African American Vernacular English. Calling it “uneducated and improper” can and will be perceived as racist as it’s a legitimate dialect of the English language.
I stopped using soap at 13 and I’m a trillionaire.
Probably something illegal that would end with consequences on us instead.
Wild to think that was 7 years ago.
By “compensation” I meant “have their needs met” not “profit.” I shouldn’t have assumed it would have been understood that way.
Aren’t those the same thing?