

Typical COINTELPRO shenanigans, amirite.
downvooter
May I wish you a happy removed
Keep downvotin’, I’m reloadin’ on y’all
Typical COINTELPRO shenanigans, amirite.
May I wish you a happy removed
Now that I think of it, he’s a POS. But granted, I guess what rose-tinted my glasses towards him is him being president to declare war against the fascists of Japan, Italy, and Nazi (the latter, prolly conditionally) and his lend-lease aid to USSR.
I can say he was a necessary evil, but no long-term ally indeed
People like fdr only cared about white workers
Hmmph… with a mindset like that, you could read settlers, lmao (It’s just a joke, never read, in my life)
But then again, this book might be too extreme for your tastes.
Emkay… seems good
Still doesn’t exonerate from introducing Ted Lasso liberal finance capital fascism (also known as Neoliberalism)
Introducing the hawkish national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski who did the following
Supporting Iraq and Nicaragua contras before Reagan did it
Supporting Angolan anti-communists and Mujahideen Afghan rebels
Backing China and Khmer Rouge against Soviet ally Vietnam (for what? Stopping the genocide there)
Backing East Timor and Guatemala genocides
But what would I expect from a white sharecropper family in a SSettler SSnake society of the Disunited SStates of Amerikkka
But okay, I guess I’ll respect that
Then, why’d ye bother responding… anyways, how’s rent on your part?
Let us look at a specific example. A claim like “There’s cultural genocide of Uyghurs in Xinjiang” is simply unreal to most Westerners, close to pure gibberish. The words really refer to existing entities and geographies, but Westerners aren’t familiar with them. The actual content of the utterance as it spills out is no more complex or nuanced than “China Bad,” and the elementary mistakes people make when they write out statements of “solidarity” make that much clear. This is not a complaint that these people have not studied China enough — there’s no reason to expect them to study China, and retrospectively I think to some extent it was a mistake to personally have spent so much time trying to teach them. It’s instead an acknowledgment that they are eagerly wielding the accusation like a club, that they are in reality unconcerned with its truth-content, because it serves a social purpose.
What is this social purpose? Westerners want to believe that other places are worse off, exactly how Americans and Canadians perennially flatter themselves by attacking each others’ decaying health-care systems, or how a divorcee might fantasize that their ex-lover’s blooming love-life is secretly miserable. This kind of “crab mentality” is actually a sophisticated coping mechanism suitable for an environment in which no other course of action seems viable. Cognitive dissonance, the kind that eventually spurs one into becoming intolerant of the status quo and into action, is initially unpleasant and scary for everybody. In this way, we can begin to understand the benefit that “victims” of propaganda derive from carelessly “spreading awareness.” Their efforts feed an ambient propaganda haze of controversy and scandal and wariness that suffocates any painful optimism (or jealousy) and ensuing sense of duty one might otherwise feel from a casual glance at the amazing things happening elsewhere. People aren’t “falling” for atrocity propaganda; they’re eagerly seeking it out, like a soothing balm.
https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/
Now, go ahead and downvoot, you lemmy.world arseholes
12+ hour shifts
Wow, you must be making a lot of surplus value money for yourself, your Ted Lasso fascist PMC Neoliberal masters bosses, and finance capital the shareholders
He’s a political ghoul, essentially… these people act as politicians, and get off via wealth and suffering
You can find the lots of 'em in Washington D.C, for example, the people who gigglin’ when they hear about victims of mass-bombing
It is not them who should fade away
It is ye
Yer ilk has single-handedly redditized the spirit of true Lemmy, you {redacted}, may you burn in hell!
Yeah… let’s make it quick, boys : )
An umbrella…
Some fellow student named Jordan did it years ago…
I’m still pissed and wondering where wtf he lives
Huh, do you exactly know exactly the term?
To me, Liberalism is to capitalism, like Christianity was for western feudalism; a ideological framework that the ruling classes of its day uses to justify their existence
Idk… for good starters, I’d ask ye this
I’d rather ask how it is not capitalist
Does this federation have a system of unequal exchange and resource exploitation of one place to another, the core, essentially, with the majority of the federation being an large mass of desperate wage and salary laborers, once self-sufficient peasants, in the resource-rich place of the periphery, under the guise of “investment”?
Does this federation love to lend and privatize foreign economies, and cut social spending, a la IMF, in order to dominate the latter’s economy?
Does this federation have a policy of CAPITALIST settler-colonialism, based on classical-liberal style property rights and genocide of the indigenous people?
If this is all merely in the past of class struggles and national liberation movements, and the federation has fought and abolished such forms of exploitation, yay
Does this federation wrecked out any chance of capitalist and liberal restoration, due to past ‘authoritarianism’?
Does this federation work without the use of money, any proprietorship, social class, and the force of government, but instead with collective ownership of major assets and modern cooperative values or ‘ideology’ being casually accepted as the norm, instead of as an old-fashioned ideology or academic subject?
This is to ensure that Communism is dominant, as to be practically ‘Communist’, in such a federation
Does surplus value, from labor, go into the needs of the people, even in its ‘authoritarian’ fetus defensive form, instead of going towards any capitalist profit or landlord’s rent, or any past economic mode of production?
Note: Personal property, such as watches and purses, do not count as private property, unless you’re using it to make into an asset, like a steam engine, to run a metro-train system, or a collection of buildings, to take rent upon
This man may look dumb but has actually no brain!
In the West, nothing new
Maybe, if there was a new better-fitting, revolutionary superstructure that would replace it
I think by its context, religion was the ideology of feudalism and the medieval times’ economy (eg. Hinduism)…
And while it was progressive for its time, when the dawn of a new system came, its weaknesses were exposed…
deleted by creator
The literal definition of “if I speak, I am in big trouble”