Yeah, I was surprised too, I really thought the crop was going to line up. I ended up getting the nose and the watch as close as possible, but as you can see the head needed to be squashed into a little gremlin face.

The reverse image search spotted it well, but it isn’t the same image. It’s very likely the source where the image generator got its ideas from though: https://lemmy.world/post/31578519/17746077

This looks like the same image at a glance, but like atomicbocks said, it’s only proof of the plagiarism in the image generator. It spit out something very close to the original, but the proportions are off.

Here I’ve cropped it as close as I could get it to the OP’s and bridged the last gap with G’Mic morph.

(Animated webp, I can confirm Jerboa doesn’t support it.)

It’s been AI upscaled, that’s why the linework looks so funky.

Edit: no, see my reply to wugmeister

For all the crying Marcille did about eating “monsters”, she enjoyed quite a few of them. That mimic claw looks absolutely delicious.

Thought I was looking at

Be careful, you can’t breathe in bubble mountain. This kid was smart and made a little window in a tall and narrow bubble stack, but in a large pool it’s easier to lose track of the edge of the bubbles.

I think if you look at child development research, you’ll see that kids can learn to do crazy shit with very little input, waaay less than you’d need to train a neural net to do the same. So either kids are the luckiest neural nets and always make the correct adjustment after failing, or they have some innate knowledge that isn’t pattern-based at all.

There’s even some examples in linguistics specifically, where children tend towards certain grammar rules despite all evidence in their language pointing to another rule. Pure pattern-matching would find the real-world rule without first modelling a different (universally common) rule.

This one?

How do prescriptions for glasses even work on your side of the pond? I assumed it was just jargon of a sort, because round these parts I just go to a glasses seller and ask him for his strongest glasses. Then he says “no traveller, my strongest glasses are too strong for you, you can’t handle my strongest glasses” and does the eye test with me before making lenses at the proper strength.

deleted by creator

But how do I send the torrent file to the other device?

The steel cubes have liquid inside too? I figured that solid steel would have enough mass and thermal… dynamics? to act as an ice cube, but maybe water is still better. Actually, do they sink or float?

Hardware Store: the Animation

Omou again, fucker.

My sides.

And I know it’s a copypasta and the bad translation is the point, but “akachan” is way too friendly for “You’re fucking dead, kiddo”. I’d go for “gaki”, which is a common part of weeb lingo and literally means “kiddo”, with the same connotations and all.

Here in my backyard, smoking these meats.

Yeah, “restore session” will restore whatever you had open the last time you quit Firefox. Closing windows one by one will only quit at the last window, so that’s what it restores. If you want to close Firefox and have it restore multiple windows, you have to use “Quit”.

What would realistically happen when the logs fall off the truck? They still have their forward speed, so braking should be enough to avoid them, right?

What is your point? You don’t want to swear, but you don’t not want to swear either? Maybe sort out your beliefs then.

If you don’t want to swear, don’t swear. Mildly censoring a swear word to “f*ck” doesn’t accomplish anything. Everyone who reads it knows exactly what it says. And if you go far enough to make it unrecognizable, like “!@#*”, now you’re just pretending to swear, but for what purpose? Couldn’t you accomplish your goals by rephrasing to avoid a swear word entirely? (Assuming your goal is to avoid swear words, of course. If the goal is to sound like a cartoon character, consider taking up a funny catch phrase.)

Edit: Oh, and this is missing the original point entirely: the original post said “fkn”. That is their freedom of speech. Someone else decided to censor it before sharing. That is not covered under their freedom of speech (well, technically it is, but it’s also a clear case of censorship.) If the original post didn’t contain any censorable words, that is completely up to the author. But if you share a post and felt the need to inject your personal belief that “fkn” is a no-no word? Nobody asked.