- 29 Posts
- 41 Comments
No idea what you mean and not gonna read the ipcc report now.
Ok, bask in your american exceptionalism if you please.
Those data centers would soon be somewhere else due to… economics. And even if not, wouldn’t be significant.
Maybe if you start heating your homes by burning car tires in your gardens. But otherwise, no. You are already so far behind the curve that economics really don’t allow CO2 emission increases on a global significant level.
They don’t even say that. They say emissions will peak which is en par with other institutions.
Wer mit gendern die AFD wählt, wählt auch ohne gendern die AFD…
1·1 year agoHave you read the article? Hydrogen is developed… fast…
The strategy is being implemented, infrastructure being build. Electrolysers and hydrogen ready NGs are planed and build. New NG infrastructure is hydrogen ready. What else are you expecting? Should things magically materialise?
Now you are getting away from arguments…
Well… It’s the current strategy.
Also, the same could be said about NG [efficiency about 30%-55% and also a little bit flameable].
In the EU, hydrogen. Either by fuel cell or burnt in hydogen ready NG plants. Wouldn’t be my first choice but thats whats gonna happen.
I can’t but it’s also not necessary. There are no conditions were no energy from renewables is produced. You have to cover peaks and shift electricity around a bit. The missing parts are interconnection and, dependend on price, overbuilding.
Pumped hydro, hydrogen, batteries. The solutions are readily deployable and economcally viable.
4·1 year agoComparing users to MAU seems disingenuous. The fediverse has ~12 million users, according to fedidb and around 1.1 million active ones.
Most of them on Mastodon.
This looks exactly like I always imagined battery storage should look like, at least in a first step. Mid-sized batteries strategically distributed in the grid for frequency regulation/grid balancing.