It’s easy to get a following by fostering fear and hate. Literally just blame and vilify a group and blame them for all the problems your target audience has.

I do agree males are disproportionately impacted by certain things… look at prison, suicide, etc. but I also think feminism would correct that. I’m a truly equal society, men wouldn’t bare the brute of the stress of financial support, for example. I also think in a truly equal society, the notion that men chase women goes away. People are just out there trying to find love and/or happiness.

If you have that, a lot of the symptoms you mentioned, where men are disproportionately affected go away.

It’s because they hide behind “freedom of religion” when what they mean is they want a Christian theocracy.

lol of course he thinks the companies are “blackmailing him” and not that the companies don’t want to advertise in the cesspool he has turned twitter into.

Even if you didn’t like twitter before, it’s much worse now than Elon has worked his magic. Why would companies want to pay money to have their brands side by side with nazi posts.

I’m surprised no one has mentioned Home Alone.

Seeing it altogether- the naming is really quite ridiculous.

Something something drain the swamp. Trump drained the swamp by appointing his kids and his friends kids White House positions and forcing everyone to use his hotels.

Don’t even get me started how Fauci is corrupt!

/s

There is no logic in the Republican Party

Can you even explain what is gender identity? Since you are so against it. What is it and why shouldn’t kids learn about it?

It is a little incredulous that somehow only you have figured out the real reason Musk didn’t activate Starlink.

With so many articles coming out, no officials making a statement, hell even a biographer shadowing Musk at the time. Even Musk gives alternate reasons and doesn’t say it, even if it would save him from a lot of bad press.

So the only one saying Musk didn’t activate Starlink was because of US sanctions is you, and not even Musk himself.

There’s not article, just you deducing from the US sanctions list.

What against US policy? Escalating the war? We already are sending tons of military equipment, some used in counter offensives.

Post the link and full article you got that from, I’d like to read but many of the links are pay walled.

Here’s what I read from one of the links you referenced, I would think Musk would say it’s against US policy if that’s the reason he chose not to activate Starlink

“There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol,” Musk wrote on X, the platform previously known as Twitter.

“The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor. If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation,” Musk wrote.

An excerpt about the raid from American author and journalist Walter Isaacson’s upcoming biography on Musk, titled “Elon Musk,” was published by CNN. Ukrainian submarine drones loaded with explosives were approaching a Russian naval fleet in the Crimean city of Sevastopol when they lost connection and “washed ashore harmlessly,” according to Isaacson.

Musk was concerned about Russia responding to the naval attack with a nuclear weapon, Isaacson wrote in the book, according to CNN. Ukrainian officials

Musk didn’t allow it. Full stop. It’s not so,e government sanction thing.

Even quotes you reference are from Musk, himself, sharing why he decided so. Musk said he chose not to activate it because he’d be apart of escalating the war…

And there in lies the paradox of tolerance… which ultimately leads to the intolerant taking over.

You brought up accreditation. I just asked if it should be allowed.

Here’s the theoretical: someone makes a religion based on Nazi values and makes a new school that teaches those values and enforces it too (so no Jews, Christians, gays, etc. and students and faculty cannot associate with said people).

Should that be allowed? I’m not asking if it should be accredited or not. Just should it be allowed. ie you are made ruler of the world and you get to decide if that should be accepted practices the the culture, values, and practices of the world you rule.

What is the difference between discriminating against blacks or Jews or women vs discriminating against gay people?

Being gay is not a choice. Someone liking people of the same sex is no more controllable than you liking members of the opposite sex. Do you actively choose to like women and dislike men (or vice versa if you’re a women)? Are you saying someone could tell you something and somehow convince you to find men attractive?

This isn’t censoring an opinion, this is basic human rights.

Take everything Nazis believe. Now just say it’s a religion. Now they start a school to spread their beliefs.

According to you, that’s totally ok… hence the statement.

The paradox of tolerance to a T

Exactly. We figured it that wasn’t right then in the same way this isn’t right now.

If a religion said black people are a sin and should be avoided… and then started a school with rules banning any contact with black folks, would you treat it the same? Religious grounds, private school, just don’t go there?

That is a firearms issue.

Untrained, irresponsible people are getting access to guns.

They should focus on playing soccer. Leaving the woke politics out please!

/s

They should, but they wouldn’t.

We can’t even get fair treatment for humans.

Not to mention, people can’t even see past cultural veils… pigs are smarter than dogs, and people who would never eat a dog have no second thoughts eating pigs and mocking vegetarians/vegans.