Adding to that, macOS has Head Pointer built-in accessibility function since 10.15. However, she would need be able to move her head.

It allows to use different face expressions for different mouse commands, I have tried it and it’s more than enough for anything where a mouse is required.

I thought it was sufficiently slow and sluggish already, you know, C is always been faster.

You can clearly identify when that’s happening; with LLMs, it’s often uncertain unless you’re an expert in the field or at least knowledgeable.

deleted by creator

Are you AI?

Nowadays, I can’t tell apart AI memes from MS paint memes

You guys are taking my job again!

Yeah, we get that. The thing is, there’s no rule that says how you should sit on a train, that’d be ridiculous (ofc you shouldn’t invade other seats or put your feet on them).

The article explains that an entitled white woman told a black man that she didn’t like the way he was sitting, and because the white is always right in America, that poor man got pulled out from the train and arrested: no questions asked whatsoever.

Imagine that someone tells you “I don’t like the way you word your comments” and then you get reported and banned for that without way to defend yourself; it’s the same here except that this involves racism.

https://ani.social/comment/12651503

Waku waku

I understand how to read it

Is there a way or is just guessing? I’m out of the loop.

1. That’s a weak argument without substance. “No, you!” is not exactly a good counter.

Wdym? Can you elaborate on that? That’s literally your own argument, you just said And you’d argue wrong here, that is simply not the definition of intelligence., then you didn’t explain why nor give a definition that matches your vision of artificial intelligence, you’re just saying someone is wrong without founding your reasoning.

2. Yes, that’s exactly what I’m talking about, which refutes your argument in 1).

Again, how that refutes my own argument? Care to elaborate?

3. That’s a whole different discussion. That intelligence is required to build something has nothing to do with whether the product is intelligent.

Yes, it is, but you kept using it to “prove” your point.

The fact that you manage to mangle that up so bad is almost worrying.

Can you point out what is and why’s bad or worrying? Like I think we’re not in the same page

Well, I didn’t think about it like that!

Hopefully there’s still students that use it as a mere tool rather than as a way to pass by without actually learning.

Like, are you seriously saying that everyone in Wikipedia is wrong but you? You’re the only one delusional here.

Believe or not, a bunch of if statements can mimic intelligent behavior, again, not like it’s intelligent, it looks like which is the whole point (that you obviously missed out)

I wanna point out three things:

1. How can you tell someone is wrong when you have no idea?
2. I think you missed the point, I said artificial intelligence, not intelligence as a whole.
3. Yes, playing an instrument in a way that makes sense requires certain degree of intelligence, the music box inherently is not intelligent, but intelligence was required to build it.

Most of them could be replaced by a high school student and an N8N instance.

Not really sure if the high school students have cheated their way out with ChatGPT.

Intelligence, even in terms of AI, means being able to solve new problems.

I’d argue that an artificial intelligence is (usually computational) a system that can mimic an specific behavior that we consider intelligent, deterministic or not, like playing chess, writing text, piloting an aircraft, etc.