It’s the largest social media right now.
It makes sense that changes to it, especially changes like this, are news.
What is that even suppose to mean in this context?
The only way for someone to make money in crypto is for someone else to lose it.
Crypto is a scam.
That is 100% what it is.
Republicans don’t get elected when the constituents are educated. So instead of changing their platform to align with educated opinions, they decided to dumb down the population.
They’ve been doing it for decades and it’s finally all coming to a head.
I’m a teacher and don’t see public schooling lasting more than 5 years.
Any cheese substitutes maybe?
But there are.
That’s what I listed in my comment above. That was the point I was trying to make.
None of that changes that the capitalist system and capitalism have a direct impact on other areas of government.
Lobbiest that work for companies do that constantly because of Capitalism. It’s an entire field of work.
What do you mean by one policy?
Capitalism influences many areas of government directly.
It’s not just economics. It’s foreign policy, company regulations, individual protections, land ownership rights, etc. It’s an ongoing list. Even cultural rights are directly impacted by Capitalism.
It is one policy of a larger system.
Right, it’s an economic system that directly influences many parts of government.
Same as any other economic political system.
You’re just describing a political system.
Capitalism is an economic system with as little government intervention possible.
Doesn’t the bolded part make it a political system then?
This is a bot isn’t it?
Get called out for being disingenuous and then run away. Nice.
When did I put any words in your mouth? What did I say you said? What did I imply you said?
Edit: lololol at not even taking accountant. Just going to downvote and run away. Can’t say what words I put in your mouth can you? Because I didn’t. I asked you question for clarification and you took it as an attack.
I’ve never seen someone other than my middle school students resist critical thinking this hard.
My first comment was asking you what you THOUGHT THEY meant. And you said I don’t know. You couldn’t even try to work it out? When it’s blatantly obvious. When they even explained it in their comment? They literally outlined what they wanted in their comment. Why did you ignore that part of it to focus on natural vs unnatural?
You’re also already arguing about them - even after you said you don’t know. Its getting real fucking obvious you’re just looking for a fight. That’s why you had to push an argument onto me - that you then pretended you didn’t do.
Can you honestly not tell which is more natural between an AC UNIT and a TUNNEL WITH WATER? You really can’t tell?
P.S. You 100% said I was arguing that electricity was bad.
You: “So, electricity is unnatural and hence bad? Is that the point being made here?”
I want to to write out, so it’s in a permanent record on your account that you don’t know which one of those two is more natural.
Copy and paste this if you truly can’t tell: “I, tias, have no clue what’s more natural - an AC Unit or a tunnel with water.”
Because that’s what you’re saying right? You can’t tell right?
Where did I say any of that?
I’m not arguing for good or bad anything. What do you think this conversation is?
Reread this discussion. I was exclusively talking about how it’s blatantly obvious that a tunnel with water to chill air is more natural than an AC unit - and you’re pretending to not understand that.
Stop trying to fight and we wouldn’t be taking past each other.
OP didn’t even say one was worse or better. He just said to look for lower maintenance and energy use. And again - that’s blatantly obvious between an AC unit and a TUNNEL WITH WATER.
But using your intuitions, which one do you think the person responded to above meant as more natural?
Probably the one that doesn’t use electricity, right?
It feels like being obtuse for no reason.
That’s just false. Particle board is without a doubt less dense than actual wood.