• 1 Post
  • 935 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 5th, 2024

help-circle

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtoLord of the memes@midwest.socialKid talks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There’s a sentence before that with a major detail you are ignoring.

    Unfounded for the main cause, it’s still a cause of the amnesia.

    See this quote further down…. You did actually read the article… yeah…? You aren’t just taking a quote of context and using that for the entire basis of your asinine argument… are you…?

    But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there’s a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

    So yes, it is absolutely a cause as that SHOULD prove without a doubt….


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtoLord of the memes@midwest.socialKid talks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    At the ages they specified, that’s NOT normal, maybe at 60 years yes, but not THAT young. You can’t just ignore key details and make your own story up.

    Also, when people say half the time, it’s not a precise amount obviously, and you don’t think that’s not part of people lying to themselves? It’s probably less than half, but they don’t want to admit it, hence the approximation that’s quite obviously not the right amount.

    They also stated it was half the time they don’t recall and the other half the story reminded them, so until that point, they didn’t recall anything actually… so why are you making shit up and lying here?


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtoLord of the memes@midwest.socialKid talks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Right, but remembering nothing isn’t normal either… especially at the young age of 30, you seem to be ignoring major details here.

    Just because some events are distorted doesn’t mean all should be. This seems to be the key part of the conversation that you’ve missed. I wasn’t absolute in any of my statements, yet you have been.

    Which is factually incorrect, you should be able to recall specific events at all part of your life, your link doesn’t say otherwise now does it…?

    The first sentence of your link says the opposite of everything you have claimed…

    Despite the vivid and convincing detail with which people can recollect emotional experiences from their past, emotional memory is malleable.

    Says its malleable, where does it say it gets erased…? You aren’t conflating these two vastly different things are you…?



  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtoLord of the memes@midwest.socialKid talks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I did say usually, I didn’t say only cause you muppet.

    And did you actually read the article?

    But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there’s a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

    Trauma is a cause, but it’s unfounded for the main cause. Which I never stated, maybe read the entire article and don’t take a specific quote out of context…?













  • Vast majority of society does it, a small fraction make a big deal out of it, some do it behind closed doors, but to say society condemns it is just wrong, it’s only a small fraction of a over controlling corp jobs that disallow it. But what’s funny, those execs are all doing it themselves, maybe open the curtain and stop doing what a small portion of society has deemed “acceptable” for the rest of the world.

    Some judges won’t care, others would love to swing their power around, you seem to be wanting to be crushed am quieted by those above you for no reason other than their own enjoyment of theirs hypocrisy over you.

    Say darn, shoot, dick, dang to a judge and you can have similar results as fuck, so what’s your point here? What isn’t a cuss to you may be a cuss to someone else, yet you want a few people to be the judge of everything? Sure makes sense

    Also, 1/6 of the world speaks English, you could use that exasperation in over 80% of society and no one would even know what you said…… I wonder if you realize how many people cuss in their own language that you don’t even realize or know about……


  • Curtesy? Dont say dang darn or shoot, theres zero difference, but it’s okay for you to have an outburst of frustration, but not for others?

    Thats hella biased dude.

    All outburst are either acceptable, or they aren’t, why are justifying one’s but disallowing someone else’s? For arbitrary reasons, when they can actually have valid reasons for their use, despite you not wanting to educate yourself.

    This is more than about cussing, it’s about any inappropriate outburst, but of course people try to justify their own, while decrying others.

    The one being biased and harassing someone for something they also do, would be the hr issue and the one up for layoffs dude, do you work in HR or something?