• 47 Posts
  • 3.22K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • “You seem deeply upset”

    nope I forget you’re here until you comment again and I have to correct you all over again.

    correcting people is fun for me, so this isn’t particularly upsetting.

    “your opinion”

    not my opinion, dozens of accurate numbers from two articles, one of those many numbers in one of those articles you have picked out to focus on.

    One of the articles overestimated a budget by 100 million, four instead of three, that’s not going to bother me too much.

    you seem deeply upset by one source’s overestimate.

    “that number seems preposterous…a totally bogus number detached from reality…”

    yeah who the heck could write four instead of three?

    how could anyone make that mistake? they must be nuts!

    adding one number in hundreds of millions of dollars of asset valuation?

    how could that even happen?

    guess we’ll never know…

    “giving some sort of response…”

    you keep whining about receiving a response (desperate), but you still haven’t asked a question.

    do you know how responses work? (that was a question. see the curly thing at the end? there’s another!)

    go ahead, check your comment. not a single question, you’re just rehashing you’re earlier mistakes I have to correct all over again.

    which is fun.

    I’m down.


















  • “a two year old opinion piece on it,”

    it’s the first article that popped up with reliable numbers, but there are plenty of articles criticizing the amassed wealth of wmf while they’re asking for money every year.

    unsurprisingly, the WMF reports that WMF are spending their money responsibly and are barely managing to sustain themselves, while every journalist that looks into it confirms that WMF have plenty of money and have not needed to do these fundraising drives for years, and will not have to for decades.

    $100 million is purely cash on hand, it doesn’t take into account any otger WMF assets.

    it’s nice that you’re excited about Wikipedia, and it can be a useful resource, but these are not contentious facts.

    Wikipedia has plenty of money, they spend it irresponsibly, and every year they are taking and millions of dollars that they add to that stack.

    important to note, Wikipedias value to the end users is contributed two and maintained by unpaid volunteers.

    here’s another good article;

    https://slate.com/technology/2022/12/wikipedia-wikimedia-foundation-donate.html

    I made sure it was also 2 years old because I think it’s funny your ageist about facts.

    I’ll talk to you in 50 years and we can settle this.