Heartbleed
Public Key Fingerprint: 0x7FFAE9D0 7D64C571 8DB0297E AD51C258 0E479CD4
Heartbleed
deleted by creator
How could this happen to me
The term is Heisenbug
I could of course say this as well. It’s clearer with additional punctuation like “I could, of course, […]”, but I don’t think the comma-free version is technically incorrect (anymore, if it ever was).
New Zealand was not Kung Fu fighting
Their main site – not generated by the LLM – has buttons for “Try le Chat” and “Build on la Platforme” even though I’ve got the British flag selected for language.
That’s because “le Chat” and “la Plateforme” are their language-neutral marketing names for their products.
Sort of like how “GM” is still the name of the car company in like France even though it stands for “General Motors” which is an English term.
Once the lifetime appointees have been dealt with in whatever way, the Court will have nine members, each appointed one after the other with two years in between, with the next-most-senior member’s term expiring every two years to keep the number stable at nine.
J K and L are shortcuts that work no matter what element within the player that your keyboard focus is on.
From the perspective of phylogenetics, if you believe that all trout species and all shark species should be called “fish”, then all mammals are also fish, including you.
actual zombies
Fewer than 5% of this population of cardiac arrest survivors “had consumed an energy drink some time before” it happened, and therefore we sound the alarm about energy drinks, apparently.
There are now 15 standards
No, there is and always has been just the one standard text editor.
To be fair, await
is a bit more like comefrom
, and it’s been around for a few releases now.
Rockwell Retro Encabulator: https://youtu.be/RXJKdh1KZ0w
From the article:
Brussel competes in the 100-to-104 age category, as categories are determined by birth year.
A video version of the joke: https://youtu.be/ehiCgps8vow
The 8th amendment has a clause that disallows “excessive bail”. In Stack v. Boyle, the Supreme Court found this to mean “that a defendant’s bail cannot be set higher than an amount that is reasonably likely to ensure the defendant’s presence at the trial.” So it follows that IN THEORY, bail is SUPPOSED to be set at an amount that is consistent with the defendant’s financial resources (including, it would also follow, increasing the amount for more wealthy people to ensure that it has the same proportionate effect on the defendant’s decision-making process).
Of course, that rule is just a bunch of meaningless words if nobody enforces it… and guess what, the main way to enforce this is by bringing a suit against the government alleging that they violated the rule. So IN PRACTICE (speculation warning here, I’m just some guy), I would imagine that they just set bail schedules at a level where anyone who can afford to pay won’t be able to win an “excessive bail” lawsuit, and anyone who can’t afford to pay it will also probably not be able to afford the cost of that lawsuit.
And something tells me that we aren’t likely to see a wealthy person suing the government for not setting bail high enough for them.