This was a nice article to read, except complaints about the bezel (really we’re still talking about bezels?). I’ve got a Intel 12th gen Framework 13, and I’ve been curious about how they’d do with the AMD version. I’m really liking mine, but a bit more performance would be appreciated since I use it for work, too. I’ll probably buy the motherboard kit in a year or so, and slide the Intel into a case for a home server.
This is exactly the kind of thing that gets backported to stable LTS distros tho. The kernel Major.Minor is just the base - it doesn’t tell the whole story.
Thanks for all the feedback!
The flatpak (I think that’s what people are talking about here) was what I was using before and IIRC, there was at least one point where the dev threw his hands up and stopped working on it, as someone (MS? Mojang? Google?) was making his life harder. That’s probably my biggest complaint about Bedrock, actually. It’s not nearly as buggy as its reputation claims, but lordy there’s a lot of hands in that pot. And that’s before you even start talking about cross play from the Switch…
I was actually hoping to hear that somehow Proton and the Windows version of Bedrock was the way to go these days, but glad that there’s at least something.
Right, there’s definitely a threshold… but we’re not anywhere near it. Like I said I have the FW13, and my wife has a similar sized Dell XPS. There’s less than half an inch difference. The Dell has almost no bezel… and fingerprints on the display all along the edge from having to open and close it. And the bezel on the top of the FW has hardware switches for disabling the mic and webcam which is probably why it’s bigger in the first place.