It def adds some flavor to the social media political scene
It def adds some flavor to the social media political scene
Looks like they got that number from this quote from another arstechnica article ”…OpenAI admitted that its AI Classifier was not “fully reliable,” correctly identifying only 26 percent of AI-written text as “likely AI-written” and incorrectly labeling human-written works 9 percent of the time”
Seems like it mostly wasn’t confident enough to make a judgement, but 26% it correctly detected ai text and 9% incorrectly identified human text as ai text. It doesn’t tell us how often it labeled AI text as human text or how often it was just unsure.
EDIT: this article https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/openai-discontinues-its-ai-writing-detector-due-to-low-rate-of-accuracy/
And here we see an aggressive communist in the wild. You have a good day, dude
I usually just ignore them.
I find that a lot of crazy right wingers do it to “own the libs” or get a rise out of their supposed enemies. It’s all just a sports game to people like that.
If you ignore them they get bored and stop being so staunch in their awful beliefs. When you fight with them it makes them feel like they’re right. You end up forcing them to rationalize every shitty position.
Almost nobody posts on the internet trying to challenge and reconsider their beliefs, so it’s not like you’re going to change their mind anyway.
I mean that’s what I think, at least
I think that’s awful an immature behavior. When you fight idiocy with aggression (at least on social media) you just get idiots who think they must be right and start truth social or something
I’m fine with the lesser of two evils.
Probably money. Given enough money, I’m sure tiktok will ban any search term
Lemmy has some very aggressive communists.
I’ve been lucky enough to dodge the crazy right wingers though.
People are dumb.
I mean it should always be some kind of removed 3rd party drawing the lines. But nobody in power wants to give that power up.
That’s the open source life though :/
Almost nobody gets rich from open source. You’re explicitly granting rights that people usually pay for.
It’s noble, but it sucks.
That took time though.
Ssh only started getting major industry support after heart bleed and it’s been the go to secure shell for at least over a decade before that.
I think all religions are just fake copycats of the one true god.
Praise be Flying Spaghetti Monster
OP out here just trying to get upvotes.
I mean if you want to be all sensible about it, sure.
It’s just a tool. The real scam is that the 1% pay such a low share of their actual income (including capital gains)
BuT coORPEratIOns arE PeOplE
“In collectives” gives me big brave new world vibes.
Literally the comment I was going to write
It’s just polarizing. You’re just making people more staunch in their beliefs or just annoying people who would rather not deal with aggression (like myself)
If your goal is to drive people away and make a space where everyone just agrees with you all the time then it’s effective.