![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/6b31ffe6-d10d-446b-8491-b866f8a65c98.webp)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
United’); DROP TABLE States of New America
I coalesce the vapors of human experience into a viable and meaningful comprehension.…
United’); DROP TABLE States of New America
I’m actually curious about that - I think it had significant reshoots and many of the villain’s lines are badly ADR’d. I’m guessing the final product had very little resemblance to what was in the script.
The best part:
In 1970, the FDA had concluded that its use in food was not generally recognized as safe because of toxicity concerns
So they knew it was likely not safe, gave the food manufacturers 50 years to find a substitute and then banned it.
That’s like saying Cyberpunk 2077 looks like Fallout.
Yeah, I get that - it’s downright silly in a lot of ways, but I found that fun myself. If looking for Robocop-type things, you did see this, right? It’s a pretty good shooter, and the anti-corp tone is straight out of the first movie.
I mean it objectively didn’t look like any Fallout game, it certainly didn’t play like any Fallout game, and it was space opera not post-apocalyptic. But please explain to me exactly how it’s just like Fallout? And which Fallout exactly?
They said “From the Creators of Fallout and Fallout: New Vegas” which is true because it was Tim Cain and Leonard Boyarsky. That doesn’t mean the game is going to be FNV. Every interview they gave, they were clear about it. But a bunch of people saw the word “Fallout” and immediately stopped listening to anything else.
Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the studios’ requirement - every big streamer I know of requires certain platforms for HD and higher streams because of the copy protection required.
Panned mainly by folks who expected “Fallout in Space” in terms of open-world and modding, but it was smaller in scope and great in writing and tone. Would recommend watching Tim Cain’s YT channel for the vids about it. The main valid criticism was that it was too easy, but I really enjoyed it.
Um, I never said it did. I said this doctor released the information to “own the libs” because he’s an asshat.
The worst part is that these weren’t even his patients - he just decided to share their private medical records to own the libs
The big difference is that all those exceptions only apply to an authorized party, i.e. a health care provider authorized to care for the patient. In this case, the doctor in question was never authorized - none of the patients were in his care.
You seem very confident in your answer, but the actual text doesn’t seem to match your assertions?
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/breach-notification/index.html
There are three exceptions to the definition of “breach.” The first exception applies to the unintentional acquisition, access, or use of protected health information by a workforce member or person acting under the authority of a covered entity or business associate, if such acquisition, access, or use was made in good faith and within the scope of authority. The second exception applies to the inadvertent disclosure of protected health information by a person authorized to access protected health information at a covered entity or business associate to another person authorized to access protected health information at the covered entity or business associate, or organized health care arrangement in which the covered entity participates. In both cases, the information cannot be further used or disclosed in a manner not permitted by the Privacy Rule. The final exception applies if the covered entity or business associate has a good faith belief that the unauthorized person to whom the impermissible disclosure was made, would not have been able to retain the information.
Yeah, it’s strangely beefy looking. Giving off Yul Brynner vibes
In terms of lore, have it be something like the king is forced to do it because of perceived attacks or threats and the populous demanded some sort of action. Then you can either play it where the party finds the real source of the attacks or it’s some weird splinter group or cult of the outlawed race and any orcs in the party have to fight against them or with them.
Totally depends on the vibe of the party but I’d lean towards the first option. Maybe a rival to the king is stirring up trouble as an excuse to stage a coup. For comedic points, have it be an area where they aren’t familiar with orcs and they’ve been getting fooled by night raids of hired thugs dressed up in bad orc costumes.
The second option might be especially good if a party member or an NPC they meet is a half-orc who has to deal with conflicting loyalties.
No one seems to be reading the article - it was a survey of only 2,000 participants on a financial advice website. These folks have already made poor decisions and likely not experienced in managing their money. The usual FUD that the OP posts everywhere.
There’s a well known issue of YT slowing down on FF clients. It’s not a FF issue, it’s Google being Google
Running essentially the same setup including uBlock origin but without a change to the user agent string and have absolutely no issues either.
Wasn’t it in Early Access before? I think this is about it coming out of Early Access?
Thief Deadly Shadows in 2007. The one after that was The Orange Box later that same year.
BTW, for peace of mind, don’t be me and download your purchase history and add up how much you’ve spent on games over the years.