No but JD Vance was visiting just a few hours earlier
That’s because half the population actually believes they’ll be as rich as those high tax brackets (which will never happen).
Dam, you both sound right. And that’s some sad shit to realize.
You are absolutely right. I’ve corrected the mistake.
JD Vance is a weird-ass, mother couch fuckin’ piece of shit
That’s actually a good question. Surely Mastodon and Lemmy instances should have also seen an uptick in registrations?
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy
I’m sorry, Bruce. These boys get that syrup in them, they get a little antsy in their pantsy. You just can’t keep them under control.
Just out of curiosity, are you an Apple user, looking for alternatives to Apple’s AppStore?
WD, in turn, claimed the firm had not infringed Suess’ patents
So did they or didn’t they infringe? The article doesn’t say. I imagine MRT disassembled some drives to examine for infringement.
It is also possible that these hundreds of employees across the globe working R&D for Western Digital may have developed the same, or nearly the same, technology. But then MRT filed first if they were awarded the patient.
Given the track record of memory and other computer parts manufactures, I would say it’s more likely that they’re simply lying through their teeth.
Read that whole thing in his voice…and it was on point
Notable Communist Governments and Their Human Rights Records:
Soviet Union (1922 - 1991)
China (1949 - Present)
Cuba (1959 - Present)
North Korea (1948 - Present)
Vietnam (1976 - Present)
Laos (1975 - Present)
References: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-rights-index-vdem
https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/global
https://www.discoverwalks.com/blog/world/the-25-most-influential-communist-figures-of-all-time/
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-seven-most-influential-communist-leaders-ever.html
https://www.thoughtco.com/communist-countries-overview-1435178
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/communism/
History isn’t propaganda
Always cracks me up to see people who champion open source alternatives hate on communism.
This isn’t about “drawing comparisons” this is about how you don’t understand why someone would champion open source software and hate on communism…because of course people hate on fucking communism, you dope.
It’s proven time and time again that communist governments bring suffering to their people. Like, some fucked up shit. Like starvation, inequality, and lack of basic human rights.
Whereas open source software can be educational, build cost effective solutions for people and businesses, and empower people’s lives.
You see the difference?
make millions of people felons overnight
Also wrong. I knew you were going to spout some far right bullshit propaganda.
Here, take some time to educate yourself.
Listen up people - it is okay to evolve our laws as we evolve as people. No one needs a fucking AR-15, and if you do, it should be regulated.
…JFC
You shouldn’t feel that way, because communism has absolutely nothing to do with open source software.
Communism is a political ideology.
Open source software is a licensing technique for creators and developers. Mostly so that no one has to worry about getting sued if they want to implement or modify said software. You think a communist government would even allow the use of open source software over government issued/approved software?
Yeah, but you’re also wrong about the gun rights. They’re trying to enact sensible laws, not strip gun rights.
The most [egregious] recent example is the legality of arm braces.
It’s not egregious, that’s called a sensible conversation.
Why do gun fanatics need these types of guns anyway? What are you hunting, dragons? It’s so cringe to me when gun enthusiasts get all upset about responsible gun laws - they just want to shoot everything and anything with the most firepower they can acquire. God forbid they have to earn the right to own such a weapon.
Democrats believe that we can reduce gun violence while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. We believe we should expand and strengthen background checks for those who want to purchase a firearm – because it shouldn’t be easier to get a gun than a driver’s license.
That is not taking your precious guns away, it’s requiring you to not be a complete moron before acquiring one. Which is apparently why you have a problem with the proposal.
Neither the MacTrast nor the original 9to5 article discusses the security behind Apple’s iOS implementation. But we know all firmware packages are signed and I would imagine this would be no different, with the recovery partition OS performing a check of the signature.