It’s just one of those examples that helps us realize how extremely easy it is to misinterpret information without the appropriate context, yet we consume endless context-less content and all the time our brains assume we know the meaning and assigns some kind of judgement on the information or person, but without that appropriate context we really have no idea whatsoever, but we’re constantly building a worldview based on what we’re reading and seeing even though we really aren’t getting it right at all. Isn’t that just a mind fuck?

They are a popular streamer, based on her usual content this take is most likely satire

You clearly don’t follow her channel, this is definitely satire

Nah, these noodles mainly use strangulation to kill their prey, they just strike it first to get it in close- it just needs to detach itself from itself and it will be okay

Finally, fuck math

Humans learn behavior through trial and error and learning from others. Maybe this will be a valuable experience regarding how they come to choose their opinions and how they choose to express them, maybe not. Who knows? We’ll keep doing our part to let others know when certain opinions are intolerable or unrealistic and they can use that information as they will, if they want. Being allowed to express something doesn’t mean they are correct nor immune to criticism 🤷‍♀️

That shark has experienced some shit!

That shark has seen some shit

There’s even a wikiHow, if you use a search engine you can find it ❤️

Are you offended?

Oat milk ice cream is pretty good too!!

Are you gay?

Isn’t he talking about people talking about him in the cut verse? Referring to himself? He’s not calling anyone a bundle of sticks, he’s repeating what he’s been called

I feel like I’m more concerned about exposed bone pigeon than angel of death, maybe because one plausibly exists yet seems really fucked. Or metal af

Is that a pigeon missing everything but bones on one side??

I’m not sure how this qualifies as being any better, I read this one previously and found it to be lacking in actual data information. It makes claims but literally anyone can write whatever they want on the Internet. It’s not enough data and not clear on how they actually measured or how many measurements they took

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414618/

Uh no, like literally any link 🤣

There is zero requirement for you to participate in this

Please look this up for yourself- these responses are sus