Endeavour OS is the case for the weekend is here and I will be home tomorrow morning and I will be done with the possibility of being stationary the time comes we can go to the gym.
I think I need a vacation.
Endeavour OS is the case for the weekend is here and I will be home tomorrow morning and I will be done with the possibility of being stationary the time comes we can go to the gym.
I think I need a vacation.
I should try this at work hmm.
It’s super sad to see. We used to complain about kids being fed digital “contents” as pacifiers, but now I constantly see older people super fixated with their phone watching tiktok videos. 😔
I guess if there’s any positive thing from the abortion bans in the US is that it’s pushing the whole issue to the public consciousness worldwide.
I live in TW, can confirm this happened in Taiwan, not in China.
I’d like to try it out one day, for now I don’t think I want to do that kind of investment in my setup. It sounds glorious though to have so many monitors.
The problem here is that it’s a yes or no question. It’s not “how do we solve problem x” but “should we just deal with x by doing y?” - which is a call for action in that exact line of thinking.
This survey is not objective, it’s subjective, with racism as part of the subjectivity.
The trickle down meme economy.
Sorry to see you downvoted, but hear me out. If I create a survey, for example, asking: “do we need to carry out a ethnic cleaning on a certain ethnicity of this country?” It implies that:
The survey creator and people who approve of it think that there is a substantial chunk of people who will say yes.
That the idea is a valid one and if you don’t agree with it, it is valid for others to think that it is reasonable.
The idea of killing/kicking-out of people based on their race, is a part of what defines racism. The survey which validates such an idea, is racist.
There’s someone who uses 7 monitors?? That’s…impressive, but in what case is a 7 monitor setup useful?
This is why we need more public transport everywhere in the world. Get idiots off the street, but enable them to go to the doctor, school, work, and everything else, so we have less idiots in the future.
He’s an idiot, true, and shouldn’t drive at least until a fair assessment says otherwise. I was saying that there should be a better, less costly, and safe transportation for people who can’t or don’t want to drive to get around.
I’m from a third world country in the global South, of course I don’t support any destruction. How is saying nuking a region a support to stop destruction?
Also: I wasn’t accusing them of being a bot, but I can’t imagine anyone not being paid or manipulated to support nuking Europe as if it’s a good idea.
Are you a Russian or Chinese troll? Please quit, your conscience must be telling you to stop.
As funny as it is, I also feel bad for the guy. This illustrates perfectly why we need a good public transport, to prevent people who don’t have what it takes to drive off the road, while not preventing them from visiting their doctors.
It’s because “打火機” is a noun, direct translation would be “the fire striking machine” which means the lighter. So the sentence is a shorthand to ask whether they have a lighter.
I don’t know much about this guy but it sounds like he’s a piece of shit
There are places where natural gas is used for heating and cooking by combustion. These tasks can also be done with electricity for the power source and then we’ll be overall cleaner. However the transition is a massive task and requires a lot of convincing (e.g. that cooking with induction is as good or better even than gas, heat pump costs less in the long run).
That’s super adorable!
Good, and keep it up