No less than The Economist uses the BMI (“Big Mac Index”) to compare economies.
No less than The Economist uses the BMI (“Big Mac Index”) to compare economies.
Middle-aged white men have a lot of privilege. It’s time we used it for good.
Is this white-saviour and/or patriarchial? Yup. Does it work? Also yup.
I don’t know if we all realize this, but some shitlord being told “What the fuck is wrong you?!” cuts deeper when it comes from someone who looks like their dad, granddad, or their boss.
I’m a 47-year old white guy in a leadership position in a large company. I’ve done exactly this to both young-millenial edgelord types who think I’m in on the joke, and boomer or elder-Xers who are yelling at clouds. I will tell you that, not only does it smack down the dipshit who thought that “lol rape” or “brown people bad” was funny, it also sets the tone for everyone else in the room, and it gets word around that bigotry isn’t acceptable.
Anyone can say this, but it hits harder when it’s someone privileged. Women, LGBTQ folk and other vulnerable groups don’t have this privilege, and get shut down, and if we don’t want that to be the case, we need to speak up for them.
Cellebrite isn’t American.
Having seen Poillievre, I don’t think he will do this.
If he just shuts up about “the woke” and just talks about the price of milk, he’d have this in the bag, but he can’t shut up about “the woke” because the kind of people who vote in CPC conventions talk about “woke” all the goddamn time, and he knows that if doesn’t go on about “the woke” some opportunistic usurper will shiv him.
I sorely wish the CPC party members had voted for Chong or kept O’Toole. I’d be annoyed about austerity spending, but not worried about fascism.
Considering he’s in power purely as a result of catering to the whackjob right that thought O’Toole was too sane, I would not put faith in his ability to keep the whackjobs under control.
It’s the old “What’s the problem with riding a tiger? You can’t get off without getting eaten.” problem that comes from courting populism.
Ohio just voted for a convicted rapist and felon who ran the worst campaign in modern history.
I don’t have any faith in America at all and the US “heartland” specifically. If Trump told them to cut their own genitals off, they’d do it.
Because Ford needs you angry about bike lanes while he does his 413 land grab.
That’s why bike lanes are in this bill: Ford doesn’t care about them, they’re just a hail-mary to distract for the other measures in the bill meant to get his highway-to-nowhere built and his developer buddies their ROI.
When you realize that a huge amount of the small- and medium-size right-wing media ecosphere is funded by herbal boner pills, you’ll understand why this is a thing.
He’s doing this to keep eyes off of the 413.
The more “bike lanes!!” ragebait he stirs up, the less people pay attention to the clauses in the act about eminent domain, skipping environmental assessments or skipping the civil engineers that are on strike.
We used to have progressive income taxes that did this.
Reagan, Thatcher and their ilk pulled them because “trickle down, a rising tide lifts all boats, thousand points of light, blah blah blah”
As we’re seeing in the US now, and the in the UK with the ratfucking of Jeremy Corbyn, the owners of the mainstream media are not interested in covering actual left-wing values. Singh isn’t great–I preferred Angus–but anything progressive he says will either get laundered by the media, or ignored completely
What just happened with the LA Times and the Washington Post vis a vis endorsing Harris should be a warning sign to progressives everywhere: the media, or at least it’s owners, are already in the tank for the political right. It doesn’t matter how much you try to be serious or sensible: the mass media will ignore or belittle you, while they throw softballs to the Conservatives.
It’s especially an issue in Canada, where media ownership consolidation is worse than it is in the US.
This isn’t to let the NDP off the hook: they need someone like Bernie Sanders, someone willing to bang the class-war drum, but what they’re getting are consensus-builders who aren’t much better than Trudeau et al.
It would have to be an outsider candidate, and the LPC party structure does not do well with outsiders.
If you’ve ever experienced dealing with the LPC, you can see why: they’re primary composed of compulsive board-of-directors members. Every Liberal representative and most of the party and riding executives are all from the same incestuous BoD members. They encounter each other all the time in their professional circles: they’re on the committee for this, the board for that, the council for something else, the executive director for fill in the blank. They know each other because they’re each other’s lawyers, estate agents, consultants and so forth.
They’re so socially inbred that it’s incredibly difficult for an outsider to break in.
And before you say “All politicians are like this”, they aren’t:
Compared to the above, the Liberals place a much, much higher value on consensus and favour-trading, and have a visceral reaction against outsiders.
By Liberal standards, Trudeau is an outsider candidate. What the LPC wanted was a Dionne or Ignatieff.
I really would like a patty that doesn’t pretend to be meat. Something like old-school veggie patties from the pre-Yves, pre-Beyond era. More of a veggie fritter, I suppose.
I know people want the meat-burger experience, and that’s fine. I’d like an option that doesn’t resemble meat.
A guilty pleasure of mine is the Ikea veggie dog with cabbage and fried onions and mustard. Kinda like that.
Mobsters, not clowns.
OPC MPPs are exactly the kind of small-business douchebags that get really upset about any attempts to correct them.
Just so you know, this appears to be cover for some other goodies in the same bill:
The 413 will make his developer cronies a lot of money; everything else is identity politics garbage to get the bill through.
This is Greenbelt 2.0.
As someone who lives beside an urban park with a lot of people tenting in it, I do hear what you’re saying, and we do need to do both: house people who can accept it, and incarceration–humane, safe and rare–for people who can’t.
It doesn’t look like it’ll matter: the Canadian economy is too dependent on real estate developers getting rich, and that’s who has the ear of our leaders.
I’d love to see property prices collapse and corporate landlords take it on the chin. Maybe it would result in more owner-owned businesses and fewer corporate and franchisees? Maybe it would mean more and more affordable housing instead of shoebox condos on top of a Starbucks+Winners+Bank+Loblaw
Can we…please just build housing directly? Just, like, build it? Not bribe billionaires, not offer P3 partnerships, just employ people, move dirt and hammer things together?
I’m glad to see this, and as someone who’s lived next to a park in a downtown where people are tenting (which, let’s be honest, has become a nexus of drug dealing, fencing and low-grade violence), this can’t come soon enough.
Alabama Burning
Please do.
Especially American liberals. Please move to, eg, Alberta and Ontario specifically and knock the UCP and OCP off their perches.