No way… ‘boring’ is their takeaway oneliner? i can only imagine that such headline is meant to steer the lazy reader away from actual thinking.

“In the context of censorship in the West, there was a prevailing illusion that the West embodied greater freedom of speech and press, portraying itself as a society with minimal censorship. Yet, I believe that censorship persists wherever there is power.”

Indeed

Censorship, in fact, arises from the vulnerability of power

Which then suggests that that kind of ‘power’ is without any trust in the moral fiber of society. And if moral fiber indeed is lacking, that i.m.o. would be the place to start building.

western censorship is ‘more concealed’

The topic mentioned in the article is not what i’m talking about, but indeed; i know a few other topics for which i’ve been shadowbanned/censored/banned on various platforms. Sadly… including this one. A dialogue trying to learn eachothers reasons is not happening a lot anywhere.

(edit)I’m from NL and WOO-reqeuest(like FOIA) have shown that govt had API access, to e.g. fb, twitter, used for censoring whoever they see fit.

I’d expect the actual interview (which now happened) would be posted already, to be disected etc.

Do you have any idea why that isn’t happening?