Then it should be “the warmer” instead of “warm hinder”.
Not a shower thought, we all saw the headline last month. And the Biden thing doesn’t make any sense anyway, he’s one person.
If he hinders warming, isn’t that in the same vein as aiding cooling?
The more you spread that over the day the better. Higher intensity will kill you, you want lower intensity.
360p is probably enough. And that’s “up to” per second, average is probably far far far less.
I like the boomhauer one.
True https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/drunk-gorilla/ (but not drunk)
Unfortunately it is an easy target. Right wing out in rural areas aren’t quite as reliant on electricity (in the short term), so it hurts the city liberals thing.
Until her fashion designer ex shows up.
Lack of spreadsheet disputes this.
…parking a camouflaged 64-foot (19.5-meter) aircraft on a rarely used airfield also used by snowmobilers.
Smith also sued the owner of Albert Farms airfield in Worthington, accusing them of both giving permission to snowmobilers to use the trail and the Black Hawk crew to land in the same area. He settled with the farm owner for an undisclosed sum.
Needs a caution sign “this is an airfield, use at your own risk”.
Only one way to find out. C’mere.
He clearly switched boats.
in such a way that things end up worse for you?
IANAL. This is what they want you to think, “just do this and it’ll be better for you”. It might be a short term hassle waiting for the drug dog, or being arrested while they conduct their investigation. But long term it’s the court that matters. And the court will throw out anything obtained illegally or the cops do illegally.
Cops are not there to help you, they just want to find someone to pin a crime on. The only one that will help you is your lawyer. Stfu. Don’t talk to the police.
Never heard of it. In a world without tv ads, how do people learn about movies coming out?
? Your point being that we didn’t stop burning coal when we got oil? I am aware.
If you didn’t have things to burn, then you couldn’t access certain advancements. Not nearly as easily anyway. We would have needed charcoal for steam engines. Or your example, how would we have processed ore into metal without coal (on any significant scale). Maybe charcoal again. Without something liquid (and very energy dense) combustion engines would have been very hard. Maybe ethanol, but production of that would have been hard. I think advancement has been very dependent on easy, energy dense energy sources.
It’s useful to think about things by turning them on their head, aka inverting them. In this case: Burning of coal facilitated the industrial revolution. Yes, yes, yes, I know all the things that it was not caused by the burning of coal, it as not “just about burning coal”, it was not named because of the burning of coal, things were iterative, etc, etc, etc. But it behooves you turn things on their head and think through them in different ways.
In the bigger sense of turning things on their head, we can look at energy sources as we go through history: We burned wood. Then we burned coal. Then we burned oil. Then we burned atoms.
Amount of work done and intensity (the rate at which work is done) are two different measurements.