You can.

Pretty soon it will be illegal to have state laws crippling gas vehicles.

At least he doesn’t own a coffee shop chain

Link?

I mean like data that is real and not a person’s experience, no offense intended.

Source

California back slides all the time. It’s banned for now but give it a couple of years and They will backslide somehow. This is America, land of the backsliders

• 2020 ban → 2022 backslide/delay — Flavored tobacco
• 2014 ban → 2016–2020 backslide — Plastic bags (thicker “reusable” plastic bags allowed)
• 2020 ban → 2021–2022 backslide — Foam takeout containers (local rollback delays)
• 2006 ban/rule → 2010–2024 backslides — Diesel truck emissions (multiple extensions)
• 2018 ban → 2019–2020 backslide — Animal-tested cosmetics (federal conflict exemptions)
• 2022 ban → 2023–2024 backslide — Gas car phase-out (hybrid carve-outs, compliance easing)

For now

But what percentage of the overall population of Quebec speaks French? Above a high school level?

Ahhh Virtual Machines 🥰

No one is saying that a person cannot be religious. They are saying that they cannot pray on the side of the street. It’s cold on the side of the street, you have a dedicated place for this. I imagine that it has comfortable seats, made of solid gold, and people that you know. Go there, get the fuck out of my face with your fucking bigotry and hate.

Religion had its time, and it failed. Get back in the fucking closet.

I disagree. Sorry. Religious people are just… the cause of most problems in the world.

It sounds like your idea of “fascism” is Socialism without Religion… sign me up.

STT

So, you’re not able to answer my question or you’re refusing to?

I don’t disagree that giving law enforcement more work should be questioned, but… religious people are the cause of… most of the world’s problems. So I don’t have a ton of empathy. Keep it in your church.

So what is an example of something you think this topic is referring to? It’s not referring to a family doing a quick prayer before a public meal.

A nuclear weapon is only as good as the resolve to use it

Trump isn’t trying to take over Canada. He’s focused on making money for himself. If he puts a single foot in Canada the rest of the world is going to shun the states (even more). It’s pointless.

Imo, Canada doesn’t need weapons of mass destruction.

I can see that you don’t understand what sealioning is Even though you posted a link to it. I’m not asking for any evidence, which is the requirement for the word.

relentless requests for evidence,

I’m not asking for evidence. I’m asking for a person to provide an opinion about what would happen if a thing happened.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewalling

No one should pay for these losses. You just lose. That’s what real estate is all about? Why are these pansy fucks complaining? Shit happens. If a once popular neighborhood suddenly becomes unpopular and no one wants to live there because of personal opinion, does somebody get to Collect compensation for losses? Ridiculous

Exactly, Because answering it would mean you would have to admit that this mutually assured destruction is not actually assured, and then you would have to choose whether or not to nuke something. If you nuke something, then you’re a bad person and if you don’t nuke something then what was the point of them having nukes to begin with?

It’s disappointing that you have so many opinions and so little desire to back any of them up with rational conversation.