Citing UN sources, the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs says that the “wholly inadequate humanitarian access over the last 4 months” means that the population faces acute food insecurity, with a serious risk of famine developing. “This is unconscionable,” the statement says.

“Freezing or withdrawing funding to UNRWA further exacerbates these risks - States which have done so must urgently rescind this decision and resume funding.”

  • WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Says the one okay with bombing schools. Thats just not okay in any way shape or form.

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nooe, right here seems fine. No but you basically said they need to be eradicated, please tell me his that’s different. And you could also elaborate on how you would combat the terrorists if you had it your way.

      • NeshuraA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        all of this will repeat over and over until Hamas gets completely wiped out

        you, literally in the same comment chain

          • NeshuraA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Should I just quote the rest of that comment then? Because you repeat yourself in the next paragraph, you’re even so kind to put a full stop behind the statement that time:

            The only solution is the removal of every single Hamas person and at best the Irani government as well, Hamas is just their sock puppet.

            Tell me, where is this mysterious “context” you mention because I just can’t seem to find it between your constant demand/proposal to eradicate all terrorists.

              • NeshuraA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Context:

                • Israel is killing civilians, including children, while attempting to eradicate Hamas
                • Calls for a ceasefire happen so Israel stops killing innocents
                • “muh ceasefire don’t work, you need to eradicate Hamas first”

                Now tell me, where in that comment chain do you, explicitly, state that no civilians should be killed in the attempt to remove Hamas from Gaza?

                You cannot remove Hamas by means of force without at the same time killing an incredibly large number of innocent civilians. You demanding Hamas has to be eradicated first is, implicitly, stating that you are A-OK with Israel slaughtering innocents in the process.

                As you say they are a terrorist organization, they use human shields. You cannot state your argument in some fantasy reality where Hamas and the IDF suddenly play by the rules of engagement.