…And WTF events related to Karma led me to come back here, because Lemmy really surpasses Reddit on all points (even if it cruelly lacks users compared to Reddit).
On some subreddits, we ask to have a Karma in comments good enough on all Reddit to be able to publish one on the community in question (it happened to me on /r/iOSBeta). I don’t know you but these communities shouldn’t get involved in what I do on other Reddit communities, it doesn’t make sense.
Another problem is users who feel superior to others because they have a better Karma. There was a discussion on r/privacy that talked about alternatives to Fire Stick and Chromecast, and one guy had proposed Apple TV, another had replied that Apple was worse than Google and Amazon when it comes to data collection. So to this guy I told him that he would have to be a little clearer by giving evidence. And there, he answers me « You’re a fresh 0-Karma account, you bring proof ».
Well, that’s what Reddit is for me. A huge social game where only Karma allows you to express yourself freely. It reminds me of the episode of Black Mirror where everyone has social points.
In short, I stay on Lemmy.
There’s a lot of trash on Reddit. But the reason why I stayed as long as I did was also because there were a lot of nice people swimming among the trash. And those few made it worth it. Always someone willing to help, to empathize, to laugh and find comfort with.
I’ve bumped into trash here on Lemmy as well. But the ratio of trash to nice people seems to be far lower here, luckily. I am grateful for that.
One thing that hasn’t changed is the up vote/down vote lottery you play in the comments. When people see “0” or “-1”, they seem to jump and smash that down vote button, too. Human nature, I guess.
The vote lottery does happen here, but the lack of karma makes it less impactful. I feel like it’s a good balance.
(I just wish that the downvote here gave you more feedback on why you’re being downvoted, while still being somewhat anonymous. Multiple types of downvote would solve this, I think.)
Multiple types of downvote would solve this, I think.
I don’t think this is a bad idea. You’d have a reason for being down-voted. Some people I think need that, either for closure or to learn about themselves, whether they want to or not.
Although where would it end… There could be so many reasons for down-voting someone.
Maybe an alternative could be to establish a simple ground rule for down-voting, like “a down vote is for something that doesn’t belong on this platform” or breaks the TOS or something, in combination with a popup or similar that reminds/nags you about it each time you down-vote. Of course that’d be up to each client to implement such a thing, as that would be client-side behavior. Perhaps opt-out-able in settings, but a sane default after a fresh install.
Just brain-storming. 😅
It would be also useful to detect when you say something that needs to be clarified further. Often things are extra clear in your mind, but when you write them down people get confused, assumers put words on the gaps, this sort of stuff.
It would be useful for the downvoter, too. A lot of people downvote stuff automatically; perhaps if they were required to think “why am I downvoting this?”, they wouldn’t.
I think that 5~8 wider categories would work the best. For example “unfunny”, “factually incorrect”, “rude”, so goes on. And then a catch-all “no clarification / other / I simply dislike it”.
simple ground rule
The problem is enforcing it. Like @AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world, people will misuse it as like/dislike buttons. So perhaps giving a way to express it that is clearly labelled as such would be an improvement.
(I’m brainstorming too, mind you. Nothing too serious.)
Your points make perfect sense as well, to me.
And you mention the ground rule. I guess it wouldn’t be a “rule” that would be enforced so much, so to speak. More like a rule of thumb. A reminder to us that just having a net count of dislikes and likes is not very nuanced and easily causes polarization.
But your points are good, thank you for adding!
I kind of somewhat sympathize with the instances that remove the down vote button. Either you up vote something you care about or agree with, or want others to see; or you discuss. Because if there’s no discussion, wtf is this platform even for.
Even on Reddit, it was originally understood that an upvote was for a comment that contributed to the conversation, or a post that you’d recommend others see, and a downvote was the opposite. But people just naturally want to make them like/dislike buttons. I’ve upvoted lots of comments that I disagreed with as long as I thought they were a good faith contribution to the discussion.
An exception is when the thread is something like advice or an explanation (e.g., why is the sky blue). I’m not upvoting a wrong answer or bad advice regardless of the broader voting philosophy.
Even on Reddit, it was originally understood that an upvote was for a comment that contributed to the conversation
That’s where I got the idea from. And that’s actually something I thought was very sane from Reddit, that I bring with me, online and in life in general.
I hover over the down vote button sometimes, and think, "Can I add something to the conversation instead of just down voting? Sometimes I’ll even retract the down vote and replace it with a comment where I ask for more info. Kind of a benefit of the doubt kind of thing.
I personally draw the line at up-voting something I don’t agree with. ✋😅 I’ll admit that. Just because up votes do send a message to others as well, as something “popular”.
In life as well: if I don’t agree with someone, I might go, “What makes you feel that way?”, or “Do you have an example of that?” or whatever. Just so I can take a step back from reacting. With more knowledge of another person’s perspective and feelings, you can more easily persuade them.
And even better, sometimes you might learn a new perspective that gives you a better understanding that changes your mind. Those times are even cooler. 👌
Understood, and that makes sense. I do try to look at the conversational back and forth, not just the individual comment. So if I find myself thinking someone I know should read the whole exchange, I’m more inclined to up vote the individual comments, even the ones I disagree with.
Another exception, though, is anyone being an asshole, even if they make a good point. I prefer conversations to be civil, and don’t want to give any credence to a jerk.
anyone being an asshole
I am absolutely on board with this 😄👍
I’d love multiple types of upvote, too. Different ones for funny comments and insightful comments would go a long way. Being able to sift the pun threads out would be a godsend.
Yeah, Stern language and a downvote seems to sway most uninvested readers.
Lemmy lacks on users and content that’s a fact. But you get no engagement at all from Reddit.
I can post a comment there and see another 800 people posting comments. You rarely get replies from anyone. I don’t care about likes and awards. But it’s nice to see someone agreeing or disagreeing with you.
Agreed
Agreed.
Disagreed. /s
I used to use “sort by rising” on Reddit and felt like I was able to engage much more that way. Then they took that option away and I was either getting junk posts or ones that were already too popular to remotely be a part of the conversation. That’s actually when I went to third party apps, I know everyone hate the native app but before they changed the sort options I was fine with it. Then a few months later they destroyed access to third party apps and I joined the exodus and came here. But it honestly felt like they were intentionally pushing me away, as stupid as that sounds. Anywho, I do wish there was more content here but at least I feel like I can participate and not be lost at sea
Neutral reaction that’s neither leaning one way or another
Perhaps you get replies on Reddit but Resdit AI censoring them because they deem them untrustworthy, or they have been (incorrectly) flag as spammer in the past.
Karma whoring is the oldest profession on Reddit.
It’s not much but it’s not honest work either.
I wonder what Gallowboob’s account it sitting at these days
A global score (karma) is one of those ideas that sound great on paper: you’re encouraging people to post better stuff by associating it with some score.
In practice though OP shows why it’s a bad idea, on multiple levels. And why I’m glad that Lemmy doesn’t have karma.
On some subreddits, we ask to have a Karma in comments good enough […] (it happened to me on /r/iOSBeta).
Issue #1: enabling shitty moderative practices. Some assumptive = braindead mods think that karma is a viable heuristic to keep trolls and morons at bay. It is not.
Contrast OP’s user experience with mine: when still using Reddit I often had a shitposting account, that was never locked out any subreddit due to karma. Why? Because I was willing to game the system and farm karma before shitposting.
And that leads to issue #2: gamified systems are made to be gamed. It’s actually easier to farm karma without contributing than to post shit that contributes with Reddit. Repost old stuff, replying comments with shitty one-line jokes (nowadays I’d probably use ChatGPT for that), sticking to high-activity subs (i.e. the worst of Reddit)… you get the idea.
Another problem is users who feel superior to others because they have a better Karma. […] « You’re a fresh 0-Karma account, you bring proof ».
Issue #3: karma is yet another thing that distracts users from what is said, towards who says it. A user with more karma… has more karma, that’s it - anything else is assumption.
In short, I stay on Lemmy.
Welcome back. Lemmy isn’t perfect but it’s less worse than the options.
Karma was used as a means to prove you’re not just an astroturfer or a bot.
That’s what they were gate keeping you over.
Don’t get your panties in a twist in the way you did, the power you’re cowering from only exists in your head.
I understand your point, but if I give an opinion I’m usually quite happy to provide a link or reference.
The last point I made is the most important one.
Nothing new about karma or age threshold to post in certain communities, that’s been a thing for years and years…
Let the garbage have Reddit. It’s not like corporate reddit really cares anyway because they’re still getting their sponsor money regardless of how their site is. It’s lousy with censorship, hypocrisy, and superiority complexes. People talk to each other like they’ve never talked to another person before.
To be fair 0 karma accounts are often trolls and or bots.
I don’t understand folks wanting more users on the federation. Its at a pretty good level now. If it grows great but if it doesn’t that may be for the best as those who do come I bet are a bit higher quality than average reddit.
Why am i sitting here on Lemmy, getting frustrated over reading about something that is happening over at reddit and is the reason why i am on lemmy…
You can watch a dumpster fire and enjoy the fact that you don’t own that dumpster, and it is indeed on fire.
Yeah that’s the thing i dont get though. The ‘good thing its not me’ approach has never worked for me.
Sometimes we need to be reminded of certain things in order to have a clear picture of how things are.
Well, I think its not right to think that Lemmy is better than Reddit. Its just different. Both are susceptible to similar problems, and both suffer because of these.
For example, that this one community I once saw related to conservative American politics. Before I blocked it (I block all political communities regardless of what it is about), I took a look and every single post there was sitting at like -80 to -120 votes. And there were a lot of posts, like at least 75+. It is very clear that particular community was a victim of constant, repeated brigading, and the fact that it stayed like that must mean that either the instance admins have no power to stop brigading or they approve of brigading that particular community. Surely you can see how this is not a great concept if it suddenly gets applied to a community you happen to like or post in.
Additionally, in the not too distant past there was a problem with users spam posting CSAM all over Lemmy. Fortunately, the moderators were very fast to clean that up and remove the bad actors, but unfortunately because of the sheer volume of posts and limited number of moderators, some of us saw things you would actually never see posted on Reddit, and would probably not even see posted on 4Chan. Reddit, as unsavory as the place has become, has significantly more moderators that could work much faster to clean that kind of thing up, and they have more tools built into Reddit to prevent that. It was a growing pain for Lemmy, and likely one that Reddit had in its past as well. In the end it was a good learning experience for Lemmy instance owners and moderators alike, but when it happened it was not a fun time.
Lemmy still has the same problem Reddit has with its vote system. It can still be manipulated, it can still make people feel superior or insecure. The only difference is that SOME ui frontends have the option to hide vote scores. And from what I know communities cannot limit posts based on account vote score (but I may be wrong).
Lemmy is a nice alternative to Reddit, particularly of you are a politically left leaning person that has an unreasonable obsession with either Karl Marx or Linux, but to say that it is better than Reddit in every way completely ignores the fact that it suffers from the same problem Reddit does:
Humans can post basically whatever they want and can hide behind near complete anonymity.
That will always bring out the worst in people. It already happened here (as I mentioned before, and especially when Hexbear was going psycho on every other instance before they got majorly defederated), and it will probably happen here again. Just like Reddit.
We can’t even escape these problems per se, because communities irl end up developing the same way.
Finding the few spaces that had no karma restrictions for new users has been an issue for years.
There might’ve been 3 subreddits left that regularly made the front page that didn’t ask for a karma threshold when I left reddit.
It happened because mod tools were so bad, that moderators had to come up with other ideas to get a hold of the bots and trolls. I think they turned it to an official feature a couple years ago.
There was a sub created specifically to help people get enough karma to post. I believe it got banned for going against rules about gaming the system. Funny enough I found it through the profile of a troll
Reddit is actually more or less a mirror of society at large now. I hate it. For all intents and purposes, we live in a Black Mirror episode, the one where the like ratio determined your lot in life. We HAVE that, with a few extra steps.
This is exactly it. Reddit right now is what our society is like. This is the lowest common denominator.
EVERY forum and community online will always approach the lowest common denominator as it’s size grows. This has always been the case on reddit, where niche communities lose their niche to the lowest common denominator.
The only way to avoid this is active moderation, clear quality expectations, and a strong stance on what does and does not belong in a community.
On the r/privacy discussion, I was on Reddit almost ten years and I never once had an interaction like that over karma. I barely even remember seeing it in discussions. People can get prickly when being asked for evidence, so how you ask is also important (and for good reason, sealioning is a thing).
I think the takeaway here is what’s asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, and not to worry about conversations with people obsessed with imaginary numbers. It’s not worth giving it this kind of headspace.
Lemmy FTW
