• Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    She had 275 siblings. Getting away from that farm was the smartest thing she’s ever done. She has no hope of any kind of meaningful inheritance. I’m honestly surprised a farm could support that many rabbits and still turn any kind of profit. It must have been subsidized out the wazoo. The last thing it needs is her hanging around, getting hitched to some redneck just out of high school, popping out a couple hundred hungry mouths of her own right before the inevitable foreclosure and declaration of martial law as the farmpocalypse occurs when her parents finally kick it and the tens-of-thousands of children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren raze the countryside in search of fodder. Just ask an Australian what rabbits are capable of.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also the explicit reason stated that she went away was because of basic empathy for others and duty to others for a positive impact on the world. I just realized that the entire plot of zootopia would be lost on a lot of people purely out of apathy.

  • torknorggren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Stadtliche luft macht man frei” is an old German saying. City air makes you free. Life in a small town can be stifling. That close-knit family wants you to be just like them. God forbid you want to do or see anything new. The moving-to-a-big-city trope is as old as cinema, and has strong roots in reality.

    • jaanus20@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      In the middle-ages in at least in what is now Estonia, if you ecaped to the city and lived there for a year and a day you would be set free from your serfdom. “Linna õhk teeb vabaks” same frase was used for that.

  • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve lived in high urban, low urban, suburban, and rural. They all have pros and cons.

    If you’re dating tho, the city is way better, but good luck finding practice space - if you’re into that sort of thing.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Mr green text has no idea what he’s talking about.

    I grew up on a farm you’re telling me that was an idyllic life?

    Farmwork is stupidly long days in awful weather, it’s either hot, or freezing cold, or raining, or snowing. The pay is effectively abysmal and makes you wish you worked in Starbucks on minimum wage because that would be an improvement. You have all this necessary equipment you’ve had to “buy”, which despite costing more than most houses is about as reliable as a Soviet era tank.

    And that’s just growing props if you’re mad enough to also raise cattle then it’s even worse because you’ve got all them to deal with and sheep in particular are more suicidal than a depressed lemming.

    But hey, you get a nice view.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Soviet equipment is much more repairable than any of the modern crap we have nowadays which is designed to be used and tossed in a relatively short timeframe.

    • Getawombatupya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a reason the kids aren’t taking over the farm. Not to mention that a 50 acre returned soldier lot can’t provide for a family of six anymore.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Well it isn’t subsistence farming by any stretch of the imagination it’s full on industrial farming.

        Most farms these days, at least crop farms, grow only two or three different crops. Mostly dictated by what will fetch the best price and what is currently being subsidised by the government. Often times you will find that farms are not growing any food stuffs at all.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I grew up next to a farm. They stopped growing produce because the government regulations got to be crazy. They just grow soy beans and hay now.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Can they not poison the water supply anymore or were there too many strings attached to get their subsidies?

    • moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I currently work at a farm and it is fucking hard work for $15 an hour. The only reason I stay is because family friends own it and I need money for college. At least I don’t have to deal with sheep lmao.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Her dream was to be a cop. Having it be a low paying career, living in a small apartment, and being away from friends and family are things we call sacrifices.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because those “loving family members” IRL are usually nosy dickheads, and there is no dating scene in small towns. So it’s either marry your cousin, or move to the city.

    Not to mention job opportunities…

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    We already have that, it’s called the Hallmark channel and exists entirely to aggressively propagandize to rural stay at home moms to remind them that they made the good choice staying behind while everyone else went out looking for careers and how those city slickers are stupid because they can’t ride a horse, nevermind how Karen hasn’t even touched a horse, nevermind learned to ride, evaluation based on real facts is for those liberals and their critical gender theory!

  • ThePac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Because these characters are usually young and cities are exciting. Wanting to get away from people tends to happen later in life. That said, I know plenty of people in their 40s/50s who love city living.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah people want excitement from movies and TV and country life is usually quiet and might be considered boring for movies or TV programs or just wouldn’t be considered interesting by most younger people.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not even that complicated… the vast majority of people that make up the consumer market live in urban environments.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Eh, my friend actually did that. I assumed that she had some sort of awful family she was running from, but actually they’re nice and she visits them on holidays. She just wanted to be in the big city so much that she was willing to rent a single room in a bad neighborhood and constantly look for odd jobs rather than live out in the countryside with her parents.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I understand the draw. It’s boring in the country for most young people. At least there’s always something to do or something to see in the city.

      I was a city kid that ended up in the country, and it’s like a different world. It took me years to slow down to country pace. Now that I’m older I enjoy it, but it took a lot of getting used to. There’s things I miss about the city but I prefer being out here where I never have to lock things up for fear of it getting stolen, cleaner air, and all the other issues city life brings.

      The biggest issue I have out here is keeping the deer out of my garden.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean I can imagine the dating prospects are really terrible in the countryside, noone talked about that yet.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Another issue is that LBGT people often have to flee hostile rural towns for a city where they can be free to live. We’re currently in the middle of a refuge crisis as trans people flee red States for mostly cities (small towns in blue states can be scary too) in places like Minnesota.

  • Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Into the Wild was kind of the inverse of this. Obviously it didn’t work out for the guy, but why does it have to? He had an idea he wanted to achieve and followed his dreams

  • STØERENFRIED@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I personally think a good life should have both: A place where you can rest, be free and enjoy the beauty of nature to the fullest and a place that makes you realize how fucked up society is and how important it is to fight the good fight.

    I pity people who never make it out of the city. And i think people hiding away from the harsh reality of cities are being selfish. but not in an evil way.

    • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Country folks. Famous for “fighting the good fight”. I live in a good city so I have access to beautiful nature a short walk from my home. Not every city is a poorly planed overgrown mining town or fishing village like in the U.S.

      • wombatula@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, do you think cars aren’t a thing in rural areas or something? You think us country bumpkins are riding our horses around?

        • P'undrak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, but it’s much, much easier to get rid of them in cities where they can be replaced by subways, tramways, buses, bikes, and the like.

          • Uranium3006@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            All of which make for a way better quality of life than car hell. If people wern’t sitting in unbearable traffic all day complaints about urban living would be far less common

            • P'undrak@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Then you take the train. If this is not an available option, you take the car, one of which you either own but barely use when staying within the city, or that you buy (which is the option I chose, it’s a lot cheaper than to own one).

              There also should absolutely be trains that connect cities together too, it’s already mostly the case in Europe which is around as big as the US, including high speed trains between major cities, but there is also a lot of regular trains that connect moderately sized towns with their nearby city. This can be both a cheaper and faster alternative to driving a car if you go somewhere you won’t need a car (say, a city with very good public transit). China may be more comparable to the US as it is a single country with a similar size, but the size of their train network grew tremendously over the last twenty years, especially their high speed network. I guess a good start for the US would be to connect the major cities on the East Coast with high speed trains, such as DC, New York, Chicago, and other cities nearby, I can guarantee you there will be demand for that.

              In fact, I’m about to take a high speed train from Paris to Lyon. Including the time I’ll have spent in public transit to go to and come back from the train station, it’ll take me three hours total vs four and a half hours by car without stops on traffic jams to travel some 400km (around 250 miles). The tickets cost me 90€ both ways, including the subway and tramway, while the same travel by car would cost me at least that much in not double.

            • Shalakushka@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              When you want to travel to the third world countries that connect the cities of the US you could rent a car, which is necessary because rural areas have apparently forgotten about public transit of any kind. In civilized countries, there’s a solid network of mass transit basically everywhere. It doesn’t matter that you’re in a podunk town, a bus comes by every half hour because it’s a necessity to have a regular bus more than a full one.

              • BigNote@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Bullshit. There are vast areas of the western US and Alaska where this simply is not economically possible or even desirable. The same is true for huge parts of Canada and Australia and other countries that have very remote and thinly settled regions. Even when I lived in Ireland, which is tiny and relatively densely populated, there were rural communities that only had bus service once or twice a day.

                • uis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  this simply is not economically possible or even desirable.

                  Life is not economically possible or desirable by capitalism.

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s enough space out there it’s not an issue. Cars are a rural technology we bulldozed half the city to makebroom for and then complained about not enough parking and too much traffic

    • spauldo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      In some cases it is.

      I live on an acre about 100 miles from the nearest sizable city. I’ve got a workshop, pecan trees, a pool, a smoker trailer, a bonfire pit fifteen feet across, and lots of peace and quiet. No HOA, no city ordinances, no traffic, and the only loud neighbor is a donkey that brays a few times a day.

      That would cost me at least half a million in the city. The little apartment I used to rent Pre-COVID cost me nearly as much as the house payment I pay now.

      Is it for everyone? No. There’s no excitement, limited shopping and dining options, and anywhere I want to go is at least a twenty minute drive. But it’s great for me. My job sends me all over the world so I get my fill of the city while living in hotels. Going home is a breath of fresh air.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Having a decent income and wealth makes living on a rural location idyllic. Someone with a low income farming job and an acre in a rural location won’t see the exact same house the same way because they will be struggling financially.

        • spauldo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, for sure. I lived not too far from where I do now when I was younger and flipped burgers for a living. I had holes in the floor of my trailer where possums would come up at night and raid the cat food.

          Still, being able to wake up, walk outside, and take my morning piss off the front porch while watching the sunrise was some compensation. Being out away from everyone is appealing to some people.

    • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ignorance plain and simple. Most people nowadays live their whole lives in big urban centers, they have an idealistic view of country life and take the conveniences of city life for granted. City life can suck, I won’t deny it, but living in bumfuck nowhere also has it’s major drawbacks.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Eh, I’ve lived both, now in the city, it’s got its advantages but I’d be lying if I said I don’t dream of going back from time to time.