• Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This would still allow the super rich to take over a town. So, another idea: A second home cap, which must not be exceeded. Say a village decides they can handle 1% of their houses owned by the 1%, but not more. Once these two houses found their part-time inhabitants, #3 must wait, or go somewhere else. A bit like garden plots, or boat piers. Naturally, this would also drive prices due to scarcity.

    • NeshuraA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather have a per-person cap. 1 Home + 1 Vacation Home are free. Every Home after gets taxed to oblivion.

      • Daze@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fuck vacation homes. As long as not everybody has a home, nobody should have two.