• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        They specifically pointed to the embargo twice, as points for wavering food security and oil for energy. It’s part of the problem.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          Sure you can blame the US first, but we don’t run or maintain their electrical plants. There is a paragraph that describes how they get their oil. They pump half of it. B%W, they can buy food from the US. It’s not part of the embargo.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            So a couple things:

            1. I’m not entirely blaming the US embargo, the Cuban government is also at fault and are responsible for ensuring food security and electrical production.
            2. It’s ridiculous to claim that the embargo hasn’t seriously hindered the growth of Cuba or made it more difficult to maintain status quo for their citizens. The embargo prevents any trade with the Cuba if it involves the US, including foreign companies that want to do business in the US. Food and medicine purchases are allowed but still bound with significant red tape.
            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              28 days ago

              Well, it’s an island. So, there’s little room for growth in the first place. Secondly,they can and do trade with various countries, including Mexico and Canada, which do a lot of business with the US.

              • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                There’s more to growth than literal expansion. The Helms–Burton Act is what I’m referring to. The companies that trade with Cuba are banned from operating in the US. That doesn’t mean no country can trade with Cuba, it’s just forcing foreign companies to choose between one of the wealthiest and most populous countries in the world and a poor little island in the Caribbean.

                • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  There have been no Caribbean islands I have been to that are what you would call industrial strong. Little resources.

                  Companies can and do business with Cuba. They just can’t use US banking or sell to the US government. It’s not slowing Cuba down.

                  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    28 days ago

                    It’s like you have no historical context for the topic you’re trying to discuss. They do have some heavy industry, they produce 4% of worldwide nickel (and therefore also cobalt). Oil production is also heavy industry. They didn’t develop it very much because it’s an island, so after the Cuban revolution they relied on the USSR for heavy industry. That was a major flaw in international soviet socialism, relying on the USSR for most industry. However it made sense for an island nation, but impacted them substantially after the USSR was illegally disbanded.

                    This article has the backdrop of the energy revolution program within the country, started in 2005 to diversify energy production and fight climate change. You want to talk about how the embargo hasn’t impacted them? Let’s start with how they’ve been trying to modernize and decarbonize for 20 years, but hurricanes, the embargo, and the historical effects of the embargo have hindered this program.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        29 days ago

        Even in a country that for decades has been accustomed to frequent outages amid a series of economic crises, the grid failure was unprecedented in modern times,
        […]
        They also blamed breakdowns in old thermoelectric plants that haven’t been properly maintained because of a lack of hard currency due to U.S. sanctions, as well as insufficient fuel to operate some facilities.

        The blockade is clearly the problem. Cuba is under siege and this is an obvious result.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          “Under siege” is when one country won’t trade with you, and the more one country won’t trade with you, the more siege it is.

          The blockade is clearly the problem.

          “The blockade”

          Jesus fuck, are you being serious right now

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            “Under siege” is when one country won’t trade with you, and the more one country won’t trade with you, the more siege it is.

            Okay that is clearly a misinterpretation of the embargo.

            The Regulations prohibit any person subject to U.S. jurisdiction from dealing in any property in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest. All property of Cuba and Cuban nationals in the possession or control of persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction is “blocked.” Blocking is a “complete prohibition against transfers or transactions of any kind.”[4] Payments, transfers, withdrawals, or other dealings are prohibited with regard to blocked property unless authorized by the Treasury Department

            This is fucking ridiculous and not in any way just “one country won’t trade with you”, and that’s before we get into the US using its influence against anyone who wants to trade with Cuba.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              This is fucking ridiculous and not in any way just “one country won’t trade with you”.

              Sorry, “one country won’t do any kind of business with you”.

              I’m an opponent of the embargo for the simple reason that it’s fucking pointless. But the tendency of apologists to point to it as some core cause of Cuba’s misfortunes is just the usual perpetual search for a Great Satan to blame their problems on.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                Yes, any kind of business. Including using their banking system. Do you not understand how disastrous this was and remains to be to Cuba’s ability to trade with the world at large or are you being willfully obtuse? Are you aware of how the US attempts (often successfully) to enforce the sanction on other countries? Again, if you seriously think it’s as simple as you put it you need to educate yourself. Here’s a start:

                The Helms-Burton Act has been the target of criticism from Canadian and European governments in particular, who object to what they say is the extraterritorial pretensions of a piece of legislation aimed at punishing non-U.S. corporations and non-U.S. investors who have economic interests in Cuba.

                The United States has threatened to stop financial aid to other countries if they trade non-food items with Cuba. The U.S.'s attempts to do so have been vocally condemned by the United Nations General Assembly as an extraterritorial measure that contravenes “the sovereign equality of States, non-intervention in their internal affairs and freedom of trade and navigation as paramount to the conduct of international affairs”.[133] Academic Nigel White writes, “While the U.S. measures against Cuba do not amount to a blockade in a technical or formal sense, their cumulative effect is to put an economic stranglehold on the island, which not only prevents the United States intercourse but also effectively blocks commerce with other states, their citizens and companies.”

                There’s a reason every human rights group and their mother has criticized the embargo and it’s not because it’s just “one country won’t do any kind of business with you”.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  The Helms-Burton Act. That’s really what we’re citing. Jesus fucking Christ. Do you know anything about the execution of the act, or did you just skim wiki for whatever looked good?

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    28 days ago

                    I mean I know about the results of the act, and the blockade in general. And they’re… the state of Cuba for the past 60 years.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Everything is genocide, except Ukrainian and Uyghur genocide, which are Just Anti-Imperialism.