jwiggler@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoShould I donate to Wikipedia?message-squaremessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down18
arrow-up1149arrow-down1message-squareShould I donate to Wikipedia?jwiggler@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours ago“You seem deeply upset” nope I forget you’re here until you comment again and I have to correct you all over again. correcting people is fun for me, so this isn’t particularly upsetting. “your opinion” not my opinion, dozens of accurate numbers from two articles, one of those many numbers in one of those articles you have picked out to focus on. One of the articles overestimated a budget by 100 million, four instead of three, that’s not going to bother me too much. you seem deeply upset by one source’s overestimate. “that number seems preposterous…a totally bogus number detached from reality…” yeah who the heck could write four instead of three? how could anyone make that mistake? they must be nuts! adding one number in hundreds of millions of dollars of asset valuation? how could that even happen? guess we’ll never know… “giving some sort of response…” you keep whining about receiving a response (desperate), but you still haven’t asked a question. do you know how responses work? (that was a question. see the curly thing at the end? there’s another!) go ahead, check your comment. not a single question, you’re just rehashing you’re earlier mistakes I have to correct all over again. which is fun. I’m down.
“You seem deeply upset”
nope I forget you’re here until you comment again and I have to correct you all over again.
correcting people is fun for me, so this isn’t particularly upsetting.
“your opinion”
not my opinion, dozens of accurate numbers from two articles, one of those many numbers in one of those articles you have picked out to focus on.
One of the articles overestimated a budget by 100 million, four instead of three, that’s not going to bother me too much.
you seem deeply upset by one source’s overestimate.
“that number seems preposterous…a totally bogus number detached from reality…”
yeah who the heck could write four instead of three?
how could anyone make that mistake? they must be nuts!
adding one number in hundreds of millions of dollars of asset valuation?
how could that even happen?
guess we’ll never know…
“giving some sort of response…”
you keep whining about receiving a response (desperate), but you still haven’t asked a question.
do you know how responses work? (that was a question. see the curly thing at the end? there’s another!)
go ahead, check your comment. not a single question, you’re just rehashing you’re earlier mistakes I have to correct all over again.
which is fun.
I’m down.