• trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    All you have to do is teaching intelligent people some math and tell them about experiments and that nature can be understood. The rest will follow.

    Everything can be accelerated by adding the idea of the printing press.

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main challenge with inventing a working printing press would be the papermaking and level of metalworking required for the movable type.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        pretty sure you can just use wood or whatever for the lettering, sure it might be kinda shit and tend to break but it should work. having to make new letter stamps every now and then is better than painstakingly writing every letter for hand.

        • yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The main problem with that is that you can’t make the types very small with wood, and the singlemost expensive ingredient in this whole printing press concept is the paper.

          So you would end up having books with very little text on each page, and especially in a slave economy, it would just be much cheaper to make handwritten copies, since you could cram a lot more words on each page.

          And again, this is not adressing the issue of even having the skill to make paper in the first place.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention inventing an alphabet depending on where and when you go to. Or you could go with ConstantScript if you feel like being a gigantic troll.

        Abugida might be workable if you reform it so that vowel markers can only appear above or below the modified consonant.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did the Greeks not do experiments? They knew math. They even hypothetically knew about atoms.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Greeks held themselves back because most of their intellectual elite considered abstract thought as more noble than hands-on experimenting.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same can be said of all the ancient civilizations.

        But the key insight is that all of nature is predictable and behaves according to natural laws that can be deduced through experiments.

        That leads to the scientific revolution which leads to the industrial revolution.

        • yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In Sid Meier’s Civilization sure, but real history is a lot more complex than that. There were people who came to that conclusion since ancient times without it leading to a scientific and industrial revolution, because there were a lot more factors at play with those than just simply the idea of it.

          • alvvayson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            An idea has to be widely accepted to be useful.

            Just having one person think about it while the rest of society doesn’t is insufficient.

            • HardlightCereal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              The actual reason science took off is that there was a plague leading to a worker shortage leading to a wealth boom, while a lot of rich people had access to coffee and nothing to do.

              • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Free time and the wealth to have that time is what I also think the catalyst is. Same with arts. You can’t do experiments or spend time on art if your entire life is consumed by labor.

              • alvvayson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                While I, too, am a big fan of the Coffee hypothesis, it should be noted that lots of civilizations had access to caffeine and other stimulants, including the Arabs, Chinese and Incas and probably the Roman’s, Greeks and Persians too.

                And there were a lot of plagues, but most of them happened long before the scientific revolution.